Originally Posted by Grahameeboy
Nah - AA.
He's been trashing my insurance thread, the bastid.
Originally Posted by Grahameeboy
Nah - AA.
He's been trashing my insurance thread, the bastid.
and he thought AA were in K4K???...........which AA is it then!!!...he heOriginally Posted by Oscar
![]()
there passed on to the LTSA that provides them insurance companys.Originally Posted by Oscar
strange we just had a claim the other day that involved knock for knock and i have never heard of membership.Originally Posted by Oscar
sorry i am not a claims consultant. i am a senior underwriter. i guess people can make there own mind up who to believe. someone who works in finance not actual insurance, or an underwriter that changes, reviews and modifies policys all the time.Originally Posted by Oscar
i find it amusing that you cant explain what its there for and refered it as a system to harass consumers.Originally Posted by Oscar
it is where claims are recorded so all registered companys can look up someones claim history. its not there to harass consumers its there to prevent fraud from people trying to lie about there insurance history just to get insurance.
brokers are registered with the ICR, i assume you work for blackwood and doyle, as they insure through QBE which correct, is not registered with the ICR. also you didnt know AMI is not registered is strange which is one of the most well knowen facts of the insurance sector
If you are a Senior Underwriter with AA, God help your clients.Originally Posted by NSR-Dan
Care to show a copy of this thread to your Manager?
[QUOTE=NSR-Dan]
Mmmm...Brokers are not registered with ICR?? It is run by ICR and funded by registered Insurer's.
AA are not in K4K..you may have heard it in the context of a K4K accident as oppose to K4K Agreement.
Read the Insurance Law Rerform Act..........sorry you are very wrong and you have just been a bad advert to Insure with AAOriginally Posted by NSR-Dan
Seriously, you should stop digging yourself deeper.Originally Posted by NSR-Dan
A "Senior Underwriter" who does not know about the Insurance Law Reform Act is not a glowing endorsement for AA Insurance...
Oscar 10 4.....over and out good buddyOriginally Posted by Oscar
Most of the ones we deal with.Originally Posted by NSR-Dan
oh gawd!!! wont someone think of the spelling!
great stuff guys, really enjoying this (even if I understand very little of it)![]()
...and I don't wanna die, just want to ride my motorcy...cle (Arlo Guthrie)
Mmmmm....many Insurer's have agreed Broker Policy wordings.......AA do not because they do personal insurance.Originally Posted by NSR-Dan
Yeah, I'm off too.Originally Posted by Grahameeboy
This is a little embarrassing...
No. Not ciorrect. Read the law Mr Oscar has quoted.Originally Posted by NSR-Dan
Anyone (including insurance companies) can write clauses and provisions into contracts until their eyes bulge. But NONE OF THAT CAN OVERRIDE THE LAW OF THE LAND...
the insured shall not be disentitled to be indemnified by the insurer by reason only of such provisions
..
It's just like the Consumer Guarantees Act. You can put a clause in your sale contracts in print a foot high and written in blood saying the CGA does not apply, and that clause will be completely meaningless and irrelevant. because the LAW has said that any such clause is void.
As, in this case, the statute quoted by Mr Oscar says that any such clause in your policy is void, except insofar as it can be shown that the exclusion was relevant to the claim
Originally Posted by skidmark
Originally Posted by Phil Vincent
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks