Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 33

Thread: Speed cameras stats, important ammunition for the revenue gathering fight

  1. #1
    Join Date
    9th February 2006 - 19:42
    Bike
    trx 850
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    56

    Speed cameras stats, important ammunition for the revenue gathering fight

    very interesting statistics

    accident injury rates increased with the amount of speed cameras !

    The uk authorities have tried to hide this information but it appears to have been obtained and published.

    Also see :

    http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-2298468.html

    Bottom line speed cameras dont work, displaying driver numberplate information with a plate XTY124 you are speeding warning however does seem to modify peoples behaviour.


    I am keen to get home and help with some of this.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    29th October 2005 - 16:12
    Bike
    Had a 2007 Suzuki C50T Boulevard
    Location
    Orewa
    Posts
    5,852
    It doesn't really make sense. Why would the precence of speed cameras increase the PIA? Why, and how, could they make accidents worse?

    One can argue the motives behind their use and the politics, but I can't see that they could cause worse accidents.
    You don't get to be an old dog without learning a few tricks.
    Shorai Powersports batteries are very trick!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    9th February 2006 - 19:42
    Bike
    trx 850
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    56
    All I can say is the numbers dont lie.

    Trying to extrapolate the whys from the stats is another exercise altogether.

    Bottom line is IF the government is interested in really reducing injuries this report should be brought to their attention.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    23rd February 2006 - 14:28
    Bike
    Kwakasaurus Z750s '05
    Location
    Crime central.
    Posts
    1,015
    Every time i see a speed camera or a cop I brake unless I had glanced at my speedometer in the previous two seconds. All these people paranoid about getting demerits + a fine for a minor infringement doing this cannot be safe.

    Speed cameras slow down the traffic flow - in the area directly around the camera only.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    29th July 2006 - 00:13
    Bike
    KTM RC8
    Location
    Leeds, still :(
    Posts
    320
    Quote Originally Posted by Edbear
    It doesn't really make sense. Why would the precence of speed cameras increase the PIA? Why, and how, could they make accidents worse?
    The general standard of driving in the UK is falling dramatically. I don't know if that's an ageing population thing, or due to the number of immigrants that come over and drive without proper training and in many cases without licences. I'm sure that may have something to do with the accident stats.

    Having said that, many drivers just don't concentrate on their surroundings and have no idea of what the posted limit is on many occasions and as soon as they see a camera they slam the anchors on and drop down to 30mph, without a second thought for what's behind them, even on roads posted with a 60mph limit. They just haven't a clue and then fixate on watching the speedo rather than the road. I've seen articles actually advising pedestrians NOT to attempt to cross roads in the vicinity of GATSO cameras for this very reason.

    Cameras do one thing: catch vehicles exceeding the speed limit. They DO NOT detect bad or dangerous driving - just generate income in many cases - you only have to see where they are located to see that.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    26th February 2005 - 15:10
    Bike
    Ubrfarter V Klunkn,ffwabbit,Petal,phoebe
    Location
    In the cave of Adullam
    Posts
    13,624
    Well, I think of a couple of rational reasons that could explain the observation.

    Probably the most cogent is the effect of cameras on traffic flow.

    There is compelling evidence that one of the most significant contributors to road crashes is speed DIFFERENTIAL. And the worst of all is a bunched differential, where most traffic is moving at the same speed but some traffic is going a bit faster.

    That is, it is far safer to have traffic either (a) all going about the same speed, whether that be 80kph or 150kph OR (b) have most traffic travelling at a consistent speed (of whatever) and occasional fast traffic travelling MUCH faster .So that the fast cars come up to the slower moving vehicles and are past and gone.

    Probably (I'm guessing here) one of the main reasons that differential speed is dangerous is that it makes it hard for traffic entering a stream (eg at an intersection), or overtaking, to correctly judge the speed of oncoming traffic. When everyone around you is going at 100kph it's very easy to assume that the oncoming guy is doing the same speed as the rest of the traffic. And pull out in front of him (incidentally, can this be the reason for all the head ons lately). Oh dear he was actually doing 120. BANG. Whereas a MUCH faster vehicle is obviously moving real fast "Oh , no wait dear, there's an idiot on a motorcycle coming at a ridiculous speed".

    Now, the presence of speed cameras is going to slow MOST traffic down to approximately legal limit. but there will still be some vehicles that will ignore the camera risk/not know about it, and proceed rather faster. Causing a bunched differential effect

    Remove the cameras, and traffic will start to flow at varying speeds. Bunching disappears, and the "he must be doing the same speed as everyone else" trap also.

    Another very possible reason relates to overtaking. It is manifestly obvious that being on the wrong side of the road is very dangerous. So the less time spent there the safer it is. But if drivers are obsessed with not exceeding a speed limit, they are likely to overtake slowly, increasing their exposure time to danger. BANG

    Or, it could be that when drivers start fixating on their speed, because of cameras, they actually INCREASE speed. I'm pretty sure this happens. Mabel is quite happy pottering along at 80kph, the limit of her competance. Until someone starts chivvying her about speed. "Oh are you sure you're not going too fast, you don't want to get a ticket from one of those cameras". "No, dear, in fact now that I look at the speedometer - which I don't normally do, because I drive so slowly- I see I'm well under the speed limit. I suppose I better go a bit faster". So not only will speed cameras cause an increase in average speed in some circumstances, but (a) that increase will probably be on the least safe roads (cos that is why people were going slowly to start with) and (b) the increase will probably take some people beyond their competance limits.

    Or, the simple one,boredom. People drive fast, they feel a bit on edge, pay attention to what their doing. If they perceive they are going slowly they lose focus , start daydreaming, looking at the scenery etc. BANG. "Oh sorry mate, didn't see you"

    Not saying that any of these are THE reasons. But I suggest that all or any are quite plausible explanations of the noted facts.

    Human behaviour is seldom simple. And speed limits don't always do what simplistic thinking would suggest.

    Oddly, I'd suggest that if you had NO speed limits, safe drivers would be safer. But incompetant drivers would be safer too, because they would feel less need to "drive up" to a speed limit.

    I think that if you removed the speed limits an awful lot of traffic in NZ would settle down to about 80kph.
    Quote Originally Posted by skidmark
    This world has lost it's drive, everybody just wants to fit in the be the norm as it were.
    Quote Originally Posted by Phil Vincent
    The manufacturers go to a lot of trouble to find out what the average rider prefers, because the maker who guesses closest to the average preference gets the largest sales. But the average rider is mainly interested in silly (as opposed to useful) “goodies” to try to kid the public that he is riding a racer

  7. #7
    Join Date
    22nd April 2004 - 15:31
    Bike
    GSX-R600K3
    Location
    lower hutt
    Posts
    852
    Quote Originally Posted by Squeak the Rat
    Every time i see a speed camera or a cop I brake unless I had glanced at my speedometer in the previous two seconds. All these people paranoid about getting demerits + a fine for a minor infringement doing this cannot be safe.
    exactly - I spend so much time looking at the stupid speedo that I think my riding is a lot more dangerous than prior to my getting a couple taxings in a row as don't pay near as much attention to the road now.

    I'm very tempted to get a radar detector so that hopefully I can speed a little less time looking at the speedo and lots more time looking at the road.
    Life is difficult because it is non-linear.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    20th August 2003 - 10:00
    Bike
    'o6 Spewzooki Banned it.
    Location
    Costa del Nord
    Posts
    6,553
    One of the reasons for the increase in the accident rate among the "Road Safety Partnership" areas, is that Police patrol numbers have been reduced. They are relying on cameras for enforcement. Some of the worst figures come from South Wales, where the Police Chief is rabidly anti-speed. He'd fit in well here.
    The areas that haven't adopted this strategy haven't had the same issue. (Despite what D50 says)
    So that visible Police presence has fallen, detection of offences other than speed is negligible, and driving standards slip.
    Speed doesn't kill people.
    Stupidity kills people.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    29th July 2006 - 00:13
    Bike
    KTM RC8
    Location
    Leeds, still :(
    Posts
    320
    Quote Originally Posted by Lou Girardin
    One of the reasons for the increase in the accident rate among the "Road Safety Partnership" areas, is that Police patrol numbers have been reduced. They are relying on cameras for enforcement. Some of the worst figures come from South Wales, where the Police Chief is rabidly anti-speed. He'd fit in well here.
    The areas that haven't adopted this strategy haven't had the same issue. (Despite what D50 says)
    So that visible Police presence has fallen, detection of offences other than speed is negligible, and driving standards slip.
    Spot on - it's madness

  10. #10
    Join Date
    3rd September 2005 - 08:19
    Bike
    .
    Location
    .
    Posts
    3,712
    Quote Originally Posted by Fat Tony
    The general standard of driving in the UK is falling dramatically. I don't know if that's an ageing population thing, or due to the number of immigrants that come over and drive without proper training and in many cases without licences. I'm sure that may have something to do with the accident stats.
    It's all the fucking kiwi's going over there. None of the bastards can drive.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    21st August 2004 - 12:00
    Bike
    2017 Suzuki Dl1000
    Location
    Picton
    Posts
    5,177
    Or maybe the reason why accident numbers have increased with an increase in speed camera numbers is much simpler than all of the reasons given here.

    It is simply that there is no link. The two can happen completely indepently of each other. It is just as much nonsense to claim that speed cameras save lives as it is to say that speed cameras cause accidents.

    Speed cameras are there to gain revenue. This is something they do very well. They have no other effect on the motoring public.
    Time to ride

  12. #12
    Join Date
    20th August 2003 - 10:00
    Bike
    'o6 Spewzooki Banned it.
    Location
    Costa del Nord
    Posts
    6,553
    Quote Originally Posted by The_Dover
    It's all the fucking kiwi's going over there. None of the bastards can drive.
    Jeez, that's rich coming from you, Autumn Leaves.
    Speed doesn't kill people.
    Stupidity kills people.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    25th October 2002 - 12:00
    Bike
    Old Blue, Little blue
    Location
    31.29.57.11, 116.22.22.22
    Posts
    4,864
    There have also been some roads in th UK where the local Constabulary dropped speed limits from 60 to 30 mph, for no reason that most people could see.... then lined the road with Gatsos.
    Drivers got so frustrated that there were large increases in accidents and fatalities - and massive revenue increases when drivers weren't having headons!
    “- He felt that his whole life was some kind of dream and he sometimes wondered whose it was and whether they were enjoying it.”

  14. #14
    Join Date
    9th February 2006 - 19:42
    Bike
    trx 850
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    56
    Quote Originally Posted by Jantar
    Or maybe the reason why accident numbers have increased with an increase in speed camera numbers is much simpler than all of the reasons given here.

    It is simply that there is no link. The two can happen completely indepently of each other. It is just as much nonsense to claim that speed cameras save lives as it is to say that speed cameras cause accidents.

    Speed cameras are there to gain revenue. This is something they do very well. They have no other effect on the motoring public.
    I disagree, it makes people fear for their monetary existence when they try to perform the seemingly simple act of trying to get from a to b under their own power.

    As pointed out above , focusing on the speedo vs the surrounding drivers and conditions or trying to figure out 'is this where the camera is going to be' doesnt help people.

    It hinders them, I would rather a group of alert drivers travelling at a speed appropriate for the conditions and checking mirrors and periperahal hazards etc every few seconds than having them gawking at their speedos every few secs.

    The focus is all wrong, but I guess most non braindead people can figure that out who have been driving for a few years.
    ( unless they are gov / traffic social policy experts; clearly )

  15. #15
    Join Date
    29th October 2005 - 16:12
    Bike
    Had a 2007 Suzuki C50T Boulevard
    Location
    Orewa
    Posts
    5,852
    Quote Originally Posted by Fat Tony
    The general standard of driving in the UK is falling dramatically. I don't know if that's an ageing population thing, or due to the number of immigrants that come over and drive without proper training and in many cases without licences. I'm sure that may have something to do with the accident stats.

    Having said that, many drivers just don't concentrate on their surroundings and have no idea of what the posted limit is on many occasions and as soon as they see a camera they slam the anchors on and drop down to 30mph, without a second thought for what's behind them, even on roads posted with a 60mph limit. They just haven't a clue and then fixate on watching the speedo rather than the road. I've seen articles actually advising pedestrians NOT to attempt to cross roads in the vicinity of GATSO cameras for this very reason.

    Cameras do one thing: catch vehicles exceeding the speed limit. They DO NOT detect bad or dangerous driving - just generate income in many cases - you only have to see where they are located to see that.


    Funny! Sounds just like NZ!
    You don't get to be an old dog without learning a few tricks.
    Shorai Powersports batteries are very trick!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •