Something like that. Most of us can ride quicker with more torque....easier to harness than outright HP. When I used to race 883's, we spent a lot of time with the bike on our dyno chasing torque, not HP. Better drive out of corners equals greater speed down the straights!
Winding up drongos, foil hat wearers and over sensitive KBers for over 14,000 posts...........![]()
" Life is not a rehearsal, it's as happy or miserable as you want to make it"
That's why I have the thou. I can't harness all the power on the street (not without losing my license) but the torque it makes, pure bliss riding the crest of it out of turns (when I'm not overstepping my ability and highsiding it, that is).
Oh yes, that was a great video, well for us to watch. Reminds me of when I highsided my RS-125 onto the straight at Ruapuna also...not much fun.
I liked riding my ZX-10 for that reason also, lots of torque, no need to rev, instant overtaking ability without downchanging.
"...you meet the weirdest people riding a Guzzi !!..."
The XLV750 would be even better - it was used to homogulate the RS750 flattracker engine.For years I've been tempted to get a frame a mate has lying around - an oil in frame Triumph modified to take an XS650 engine.The Triumph frame is almost identical to a Trackmaster frame,they were used as the model for the production frame.A lot of parts to find,modify,adapt and build....I'd love to do it,but need to put myself into a better position time wise.
In and out of jobs, running free
Waging war with society
In and out of jobs, running free
Waging war with society
What about something like this, Motu
http://www.trademe.co.nz/Trade-Me-Mo...n-72779342.htm
XS650 project.
"...you meet the weirdest people riding a Guzzi !!..."
So the HD has the same torque as the litre 4 cylinder. Just not as much top end power. Which everyone says they can't use on the road anyway. So why bag HD for 90hp? If what's really wanted is torque not power?
Serious question. Can anyone say they use more than 70hp on the road? More than 100hp? . I'm not talking about wanting a bike with > 100hp for the sake of low end torque (as OAB was). I'm asking if anyone actually uses > 100hp on the road., ie a > 100hp engine and wringing its nuts off, keeping the revs right up at the red line all the time, like someone on a 250 does? Remembering that a 150hp bike doesn't produce that figure unl;ess it's pretty near the red line.
Cos if people don't actually use the top end power of the 100hp+ jobs, then the HD actually seems a lot more sensible. Same torque, which IS used, less top end horsepower, which isn't.
Originally Posted by skidmark
Originally Posted by Phil Vincent
The other thing to take into consideration is that HD have to make it a reasonable weight too, to take advantage of the torque and make it handle decently, like Buell has.
"...you meet the weirdest people riding a Guzzi !!..."
While I can't use all the power all the time, I love it when I can. Hence why the thou holds more appeal to me than a 90hp bike with the same torque.
Nearly perfect,but a bit of a mismatch with the wheels.I'm a dab hand at picking up other people projects and finishing them off.But it's not even worth half the starting price,let alone whatever the reserve is.
How much hp do we need? I suspect if we had on board data for ''the fight club'' for example doing their thing....they might be very surprised with what they see.Probably pulling hp figures for a 250.
I've found I like certain hp figures for different sized bikes...60hp is good for a bigger bike,and 40hp for a smaller one.Exactly what the XLV750 and DT230 are,and both have the same power to weight ratio - it's power I can use nearly all of,but still enough to get me into trouble.Actualy the DT230 is agressive at lower speeds and I have to treat it with more respect than I did the XLV750 on the same roads.So 40hp is too much for me...
In and out of jobs, running free
Waging war with society
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks