back on topic....
what country did this happen in?
My two-penneth worth:
The position at the center of the deposited weld metal would suggest some sort of discontinuity or segregation along there. As mentioned previously, weld metal is generally stronger than the surrounding parent metal, generally due to a higher alloy spec and a refined grain structure due to the high rate of cooling after welding (it is essentially a cast metal and the parent metal acts a a big chill during solidification). The weak points in a good weld are generally the fusion line or the heat affected zone of the parent metal.
As a weld is a casting, it can be affected as per normal castings; with shrinkage porosity, gas porosity, slag inclusions and segregation (changing alloy composition due to concentration effects during solidification).
If the QC checks are any good, bad welds would not get through - e.g. poor geometry (undercuts, lack of fusion, lack of penetration) and if they do UT checks, that would pick up slag and porosity. But centerline segregation is hard to pick up without destructive testing.
What such segregation does is it reduces the strength somewhat, but it also reduces the ductility and toughness of the material, reducing the ability to absorb impact damage - it will crack rather than plastically deform. The centerline of the weld is the most likely place for segregation (last place to solidify, and it generally has the coarsest grains (weakest and least ductile part of the weld).
In my experience, cracks due to lack of fusion/lack of penetration tend to travel up the "fusion" line, rather than the centerline. What would be interesting is to see if there was any deformation of the weld and HAZ before fracture - this would indication a lack of ductility at the centerline.
Anyway, that is why I think the weld cracked up the middle rather than the side. The root cause of the failure anyway was GSXR meeting wall at some rate of knots.
Cheers,
FM
Seesh FM, never let it be said that you dont know your welds mate![]()
Is a centerline failure cause for general concern? I.e. - if it happened on this bike it could have happened on others.
But then - is that tempered by the fact the fault will only become obvious when run into brick walls (i.e. it's not really a problem after all)
?
$2,000 cash if you find a buyer for my house, kumeuhouseforsale@straightshooters.co.nz for details
Need something to do when not riding??? Come and learn to dance with us at www.cerocstars.co.nz
lucky man.
back on topic, surely this is a warranty claim, under the JRA clause?
Dear Mr Suzuki
I was Just Riding Along, when I had to suddenly stop. The frame on my new K7 Gixxer Thou cracked, as per the photographs attached.
I believe this is a manufacturing fault, and I will be pleased to receive a new GSXR1000 at your early convenience.
Thank you for your prompt attention
JRA guy.
I thought elections were decided by angry posts on social media. - F5 Dave
It's hard to say - depends on what the design/specification requirements for the frame was (e.g. has to absorb an impact of xx joules without fracture). Cars have standards that they have to meet in terms of energy absorption - don't know if bikes have similar standards, but i doubt it.
The fact that the weld fractured along the centerline could mean that the fusion line and HAZ are in fact a lot stronger than they usually are - perhaps due to better than normal welding procedure. I think your last statement would be highly accurate!
Cheers,
FM
Should be a recall - Why arent suzuki honest about it.
Triumph did.
Reactor Online. Sensors Online. Weapons Online. All Systems Nominal.
No of course not.....thats just silly. (pt)
I saying that frames shouldn't brake that badly on a seam. When the triumph 1's did (after poms complained about hitting walls and fucking their bike) they recalled and got the frame strengthened.
He only made it 50 meters......how fast can ya go in 50m? what speed/impact was the frame suppose to take.
Reactor Online. Sensors Online. Weapons Online. All Systems Nominal.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks