Their trousers also.
Their trousers also.
If a man is alone in the woods and there isn't a woke Hollywood around to call him racist, is he still white?
Indeed. Flagrant displays of butt crack cheapens their demeanor.
"Standing on your mother's corpse you told me that you'd wait forever." [Bryan Adams: Summer of 69]
One wouldn't be waiting long with "abated" breath.
If a man is alone in the woods and there isn't a woke Hollywood around to call him racist, is he still white?
Back on topic now, a good rider, cannot be defined I dont think.
It seems to me, that even the best riders are still learning, new ideas and styles are constantly being thought up. So nomatter who is in front of you, weather they may be better or worse, the potential is there to learn something from them.
There are plenty of fast riders, who crash very seldom, and plenty of slow riders who crash a lot, but as Cowpoos says every thirty seconds, "It's easy to teach a fast rider not to crash, but hard to teach a slow rider to be fast."
"Good" must first be defined, before you can achieve the goal.
And, trousers, that is the most important thing, bling for Jim2 for pointing it out.![]()
Having the gear means you're responsible. A rider that has only shorts and a tshirt is a dick that deserves to get busted up. A rider that forgoes wearing proper gear on account of it being too hot, too bulky, or too time consuming to put on is NOT a good rider as they are not responsible.
This ties in with my silly buggers thought as well. Both indicate responsibility. Responsible riders are good riders. Unresponsible riders are a menace and noone thinks they're cool.
Hence my comments stand.
I'm a bad rider then.
What do you do when this conflicts with "ride your own ride"?
By way of example we are on the noob ride on ANZAC day and riders are just rocking up to a corner from the left or right, where ever they happened to be in their stagger pattern.
If there is a pot hole, rough surface, seal repairs, tar bleed or a corner I am out of formation riding my own ride thanks.
Actually they don't stand at all Mr wookie, and I don't like the implication that motorcyclists who don't conform to your standards "deserve" injury or death.
"Unresponsible" isn't a word.
If a man is alone in the woods and there isn't a woke Hollywood around to call him racist, is he still white?
Being responsible doesn't make you a good rider though does it... heck if you are a good rider you shouldn't need to have the gear cause you ain't gonna bin it are you... the responsible bit wearing the gear is even though you are a great rider, you don't trust the other buggers on the road.
Valentino Rossi's quite good apparently.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks