EEEEEEKK 16-times more pollution!

[huck farley]

FFS,
In summary...the original poster is spouting shite

Now the real question...will any of this affect cheap motorcycle imports.
http://www.landtransport.govt.nz/pub...heet-2-08.html

TAKE THAT UP WITH THE WRITER NOT THE POSTER. SHIT FOR BRAINS

[scracha]

You know, I used to teach eleven year olds to check their information sources and not believe everything they read on the Internet. Retard.

You gonna read Mein Kampf next week and tell us all the Jews are stealing our money?

TAKE THAT UP WITH THE WRITER NOT THE POSTER. SHIT FOR BRAINS

[huck farley]

http://www.empa.ch/plugin/template/empa/*/46419/---/l=1

Big gob reckons I'm posting shite aye? well here's another paper from the same institute on the matter. Perhaps now you can get your foot outa your gob!!

[huck farley]

If these numbers are even remotely accurate (which i doubt as there are no actual numbers, just factors of numbers we don't know) .

http://www.empa.ch/plugin/template/empa/*/46419/---/l=1

I do believe them to be right, after all it is a credited institute standing behind it's Scientists findings.

[RC1]

i wont believe it til it on telly, then it must be true

[Forest]

I saw a quote recently but I can't remember where I saw it (probably in the Herald online).

The quote said that a single badly tuned truck engine can put out as much soot and particulate pollution as 1,000 cars. Which was interesting given that trucks are not subject to the recent changes in the emissions testing laws.

[Coyote]

Disproportionately high? So we're still doing better than cars who the vast majority have 1 occupant in them and are pumping out more gas since they're carrying an air conditioned room with them?

I raise your ship with my sailing ship. Zero energy, zero pollution. How come the greenies havent gotten on to this?

Unless we replace roads with viaducts, Blokarts would be a better option.

[scracha]

http://www.empa.ch/plugin/template/empa/*/46419/---/l=1

I do believe them to be right, after all it is a credited institute standing behind it's Scientists findings.

You really are a complete fucktard. So you've verified the paper from this institute.....by looking at another paper from the same institute.

[k14]

I raise your ship with my sailing ship. Zero energy, zero pollution. How come the greenies havent gotten on to this?

Because it has the same problem as wind power The wind doesn't blow all the time does it?

[The Stranger:Me]

in order to produce power, you must burn fuel, the more efficiently you can combust the fuel the more power you will make.

I like your idea there, and always thought along those lines too, until - Take the Fazer 130hp at the rear wheel.

Now slice open the air box, replace the air cleaner and secondary flies, Gut the cat from the collector and replace the stock can with a yoshi (doing away with the second cat). It breathes nicely now.
Add in a fuel cut eliminator and PC3 and it is now pulling about 153 at the rear wheel. I say about as this is based on overseas experience, however suffice to say it has a lot more power right across the entire rev range.

Fuel usage is gone out the window. From 220km to reserve to about 170km to reserve.

Ok, yamaha had it lean between about 4,000 - 5,000 rpm, but not by a lot. On average, looking at the map I would say an additional 5% fuel has been added across the range, yet fuel economy has decreased by about 23%.

Not complaining and it isn't going back to stock anytime soon, but why should the fual usage increase?

[The Stranger:Me]

I do believe them to be right, after all it is a credited institute standing behind it's Scientists findings.

Seriously, you need to review their methodology and their numbers yourself. There are some astounding flawed studies come out of some reputable institutions.
I have been into this in dept in the past with medical studies. Some of that shit would shock you and some of the conclusions are just astounding. Like running a 5 yr follow up study of a particular drug. Respondants whom didn't complete the full 5 yrs were excluded from the results. So yes the drug performed extreemly well as it is very hard for dead people to respond negatively to the study.

[huck farley]

You really are a complete fucktard. So you've verified the paper from this institute.....by looking at another paper from the same institute.

Stop your mumbling. Get your foot out of your big gob, and speak properly and behave yourself. Nobody likes you when your'e being silly.

[huck farley]

Seriously, you need to review their methodology and their numbers yourself. There are some astounding flawed studies come out of some reputable institutions.
I have been into this in dept in the past with medical studies. Some of that shit would shock you and some of the conclusions are just astounding. Like running a 5 yr follow up study of a particular drug. Respondants whom didn't complete the full 5 yrs were excluded from the results. So yes the drug performed extreemly well as it is very hard for dead people to respond negatively to the study.

I attended the school of hard knocks, I make my own findings. You don't think for one minute people are going to believe what you post simply because you obiously think you are a better person than most on here, simply because you made it to the sixth form. I think also you maybe snorting some of that shit you are giving to your lab rats.

[scracha]

I attended the school of hard knocks,

School of hard knocks....is that the one before the university of life?

[huck farley]

Thanks for dobbing me in scratcha. I just got a warning from Admin thanks to you.
Like a Christmas cake, you'll keep!! My only wish is if I was doing life, I would love to have you as a cellmate.

What clown would go dobbing in another biker!! Shame on you. In future just give as good as you get OK? Don't go dobbing anyone else in Just because you don't agree with a legitimate posting.