...
...
Grass wedges its way between the closest blocks of marble and it brings them down. This power of feeble life which can creep in anywhere is greater than that of the mighty behind their cannons....... - Honore de Balzac
Come on. Cheese cutters are dangerous but I bet a lot more people have been saved but them stopping cars crossing the centre line then killed by them. Not as good as a concrete barrier but better then nothing. Theres way too much other dangerous stuff out there to be just focusing on cheese cutters. You going to ride slow round lamposts, power poles, stone walls, and any road with a fence paralleling it too?
Im sorry, your opinion does not conform.
You are to be executed.
No seriously it is a valid point.
I like the Idea of an "impeding the flow of traffic" style protest but there are a few negitives for me.
One is Altho I am against WRB's in stupid places (such as left side of lane) I do see a use for them. Concrete is always going to be better for us but sometimes they could be better than nothing.
The other issue is bags not being at the back!
I guess that shows that after some consideration: I still like the idea overall.![]()
Heinz Varieties
I'd rather take my chances against any of the other things that you mentioned, rather than a cheesecutter.
And I don't see why we should have to settle on "better than nothing" when there are far better options for us out there.
I don't see that we should be considered bottom of the heap, or not considered at all, when it comes to decisons aboout road safety. After all, I pay taxes and registrations on 6 vehicles, and I deserve better! As do my fellow motorcyclists.
What is good for us on two wheels, is ultimately a shit load better for all those on 4 wheels as well!
Diarrhoea is hereditary - it runs in your jeans
If my nose was running money, I'd blow it all on you...
Heinz Varieties
my blog: http://sunsthomasandfriends.weebly.com/index.html
the really happy person is one who can enjoy the scenery when on a detour.
Point taken, but as I've said before, you've gotta start somewhere. These things are unnecessarily dangerous and at too closer proximity to be ignored. Power poles are slowly disappearing as are a lot of roadside objects. We can't get rid of 'em all but we can minimize what is there and doesn't need to be that way. We're not asking them to remove the barriers, just make 'em safe or use safer one's. There are viable alternatives....
Drew for Prime Minister!
www.oldskoolperformance.com
www.prospeedmc.com for parts ex U.S.A ( He's a Kiwi! )
Lamp-posts, power poles and the like are avoidable, even if one runs off road one can aim to miss them. Stone walls and fences are surviveable.
WRBs are neither avoidable, nor surviveable.
Originally Posted by skidmark
Originally Posted by Phil Vincent
They don't stop cars crossing the centre line. They absorb energy by stretching and can deform up to 4 metres if hit head on at 100km/hr. The installation guidelines take this into account and insist that they are this distance away from traffic on both sides. They are designed to be installed in a central reservation, not right next to a traffic flow on the centre line as they are installed in NZ.
Transit have installed them incorrectly and this installation methodology makes it more likely that a motorcyclist hitting them at open road speeds will die.
All we are asking is that if they have to use them, they use them according to the manufacturers instructions. It's not rocket science.
The 70km.hr limit has been proposed by my mate fatjim-who-is-about-as-fat-as-jim2 (the 2 stands for 2 people), because you are more likely to "only" lose limbs if you strike one obliquely, rather than just die, as you do at 100km.hr. These are not made up figures, but gathered from analysis of accidents involving motorcyclists in European countries who are now either cladding WRBs or removing them. Countries who actually care about an individual's life and potential contribution, rather than just writing them off as "special people" who deserve to die, if they even think about them at all.
If a man is alone in the woods and there isn't a woke Hollywood around to call him racist, is he still white?
Bad idea. You are heightening the accident risk for non participating riders trying to get past the mobile road block.
I'm a bit of a late comer to this campaign (started riding in December) but have done some reading since. It appears to me that the best approach is to attack WRB from a cost point of view rather than safety. There has been some interesting study done in Australia (not sure how effective they've been) that shows, while WRB are marginally cheaper to install than concrete, the cost to maintain WRB is significantly higher. Also there is greater chance of injury from WRB leading to higher health system costs.
The study also notes that WRB are much less effective (or not at all) than concrete with some vehicles, namely motorbikes and trucks.
Concrete is a cheaper and more effective solution. If we could persuade an opposition MP to take up the cause and back it up with credible evidence then we could potentially make this an election issue.
Mr Dynhoven talks the talk. It's time for the opposition to call him on it.
Visit the team here - teambentley
Thanks to my sponsors : The Station Sports Cafe and Bar | TSS Red Baron | Zany Zeus | Continental | The Office Relocation Company | Fine Signs | Stokes Valley Collision Repair | CBWD Digital Media Inbound Marketing
Ahhh yes but the opposition love showing how the polys are mis-spending public money on fool hardy projects (at least they used to).
I like this report the best.
Wire Rope “Un-safety” Barrier (WRUB)
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks