Yeah Scummy, I agree with these guys. About time you and your lot re-wrote the rules on policing, the last set you frontline guys drafted up must be really embarassing the top brass and government. I mean how in the hell did they give the responsibility of creating the policy on policing to you guys in the first place, all you do is sit in your cars all day on your fat arses with a speed gun.
Holy fuck, are you for real, or just pretending to be a pathetic and lonely loser who jumps on a high horse and gets all "morally outraged" when an off-duty cops says shit in their own time, at home, on the net, not as a police officer?
Are you for real? Because if you are, you are one of the folk we need less of in this country.
You the very worst of the PC-screamers.
You are against free-speech.
Forget Helen Clark, you've gone far beyond her. I won't invoke Godwin's law, but that's where you're headed.
You are hateful, perhaps filled with some grudge born from another incident in the past.
Perhaps you're such a little man, so weak and powerless and ineffectual, that you feel the need to have a go at people on the internet, to make yourself feel big and tough, as you try to stir trouble.
I am astounded by your ignorance and wilful stirring.
I meet people like you maybe once every few years, and wonder how they got so old with common sense like that.
Why don't you shut the fuck up... and go out your front door and do something nice for someone.
Try to make things better in your desolate little town instead of trying to make the rest of NZ suck as much as your life must.
Yeah you tell 'em Steam!
At least when they're sitting in their cars with their radar guns and their doughnuts they won't be hanging around on street corners harrassing old ladies and causing trouble! Bloody coppers
/shuffles off to find a good seat.
![]()
It is preferential to refrain from the utilisation of grandiose verbiage in the circumstance that your intellectualisation can be expressed using comparatively simplistic lexicological entities. (...such as the word fuck.)
Remember your humanity, and forget the rest. - Joseph Rotblat
It is preferential to refrain from the utilisation of grandiose verbiage in the circumstance that your intellectualisation can be expressed using comparatively simplistic lexicological entities. (...such as the word fuck.)
Remember your humanity, and forget the rest. - Joseph Rotblat
Case in point, look at how long it took the local cop to flog the front Weill? Far out there are some bent cops out there.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V8COCPyB-go
Sever
Now and forever
you're just another lost soul about to be mine again
see her, you'll never free her
you must surrender it all
And give life to me again
Disturbed - Inside the Fire
No. The law is almost entirely silent about flashing headlamps (in this context).
You could get done for flashing in such a way as to dazzle or blind oncoming traffic.
Otherwise , there is nothing about flashing them at all. At most they might be considered to have the same function as the horn - to alert other traffic to something they should be aware of,a warning signal. The visual equivalent of tooting.
As always the law is many years behind the fair, and has not gotten round to dealing with the practice.
Of course, if you are silly enough to ADMIT that you were flashing to warn motorists, there are several things they might charge you with (though it's doubtful any would stand up to a determined defence). Just as they could if you held up a sign saying "Radar cop ahead".
Originally Posted by skidmark
Originally Posted by Phil Vincent
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks