Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 60

Thread: Two-stroke emissions not so bad?

  1. #16
    Join Date
    26th September 2007 - 13:52
    Bike
    Scorpio
    Location
    Tapu te Ranga
    Posts
    1,471
    Quote Originally Posted by Ixion View Post
    I got the maths wrong BTW, its only 30 times as much.
    Oops, I should have noticed that. (I'd insert an "embarrassed" smiley, but I can't find it.) A factor of 30 is closer to what I've seen from other sources.

    There remains the question of how much hydrocarbon emissions matter. I'm not sure about that.

    Edit: Actually, we're both still wrong, 7500/300 = 25.
    Last edited by Badjelly; 12th March 2008 at 13:00. Reason: Posterity

  2. #17
    Join Date
    26th September 2007 - 13:52
    Bike
    Scorpio
    Location
    Tapu te Ranga
    Posts
    1,471
    Quote Originally Posted by Ixion View Post
    Of course it is. Two strokes are never a problem. They're SPECIAL.
    Ridden by SPECIAL people?

  3. #18
    Join Date
    31st January 2007 - 21:11
    Bike
    1986 Suzuki RG500
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    44
    The real issue with a 2 stroke is the un-burnt hydrocarbons, not the burnt ones (i.e. the smoke) as the dangerous stuff is in the particles that are blown out the back end. They tend to over fuel i.e. there more fuel goes in than they can burn, so at the exhaust the level of un-burnt stuff is quite high. In a large way this is just a function of the way a 2 stroke works in that the charge is sucked through to the exhaust can then rammed back by the reflected pulse, only not all of it makes it, hence the emisson issues (and consumption problems).

    I, of course prefer to think that its all an evil plot hatched by 4-stroke owners who new they would never be able to compete any other way so they set out to ban them!

  4. #19
    Join Date
    22nd July 2006 - 11:59
    Bike
    900 Hornet, Preddy, RZ's, A100's
    Location
    Auckland, Takanini
    Posts
    5,159
    Blog Entries
    54
    Quote Originally Posted by Badjelly View Post
    Ridden by SPECIAL people?
    Ahyuk Momma always done tol'me I wuz always speshul!

    I luvs my purty two-stroker smoker I does, she always done me no wrong and is the sunshine in ma' life!

    Dem'blimm'n gubbermint types are always angl'n to cheat us simple folk they is!

    Well if'n they come fer my Pippi and Daisy, I got a double load of varmint chasers for dem' whee doggy!
    "I like to ride anyplace, anywhere, any time, any way!"

  5. #20
    Quote Originally Posted by Badjelly View Post
    There remains the question of how much hydrocarbon emissions matter.
    Frankly Badjelly....I don't give a damn.Riding a 2 stroke is worth all the black looks and talking behind my back - riding bikes is all about having fun,and shit...nothing is as much fun as a 2 stroke motorcycle!

  6. #21
    Join Date
    27th March 2006 - 09:22
    Bike
    2004 Suzuki GS1200SS
    Location
    West Auckland
    Posts
    168

    Woo Hoo to that alright

    Quote Originally Posted by Ixion View Post
    Two strokes are also effectively exempted from the WoF visible smoke test (technically, they must not smoke more than they did when new. But who is going to be able to judge that !)

    So when I accidently make a 20:1 premix and look like I'm laying chemtrails through the waitakeres and around west auckland, I'll tell mr policeman that i've always run it at 20:1 and it has smoked like that from day one.
    Never had one seize on me yet.

  7. #22
    Join Date
    6th January 2008 - 12:48
    Bike
    1999 RS250 Aprilia
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    178
    It was a shame when the emissions laws stopped most companies from producing the bigger 2 strokes, personally i love them 2 bits

    from owning a 4stroke 250 and going back to a 2stroke you can visibly see the amount of beautiful smelling smoke there is come out of the back of the 2stroke (and if your in a closed garage you'll soon realise how much, lol). Also as you have to run alot of them for 5 mins befor you ride anywhere anyway, ur running the engine for longer than you would a 4stroke aswell.

    But thanx ixon, nice to no my baby will be safe till the oil runs out

  8. #23
    Join Date
    26th February 2005 - 15:10
    Bike
    Ubrfarter V Klunkn,ffwabbit,Petal,phoebe
    Location
    In the cave of Adullam
    Posts
    13,624
    Quote Originally Posted by craigs288 View Post
    So when I accidently make a 20:1 premix and look like I'm laying chemtrails through the waitakeres and around west auckland, I'll tell mr policeman that i've always run it at 20:1 and it has smoked like that from day one.
    Never had one seize on me yet.
    Yep. From the VIR manual

    Vehicle with two-stroke engine or
    rotary engine.
    The smoke produced is not noticeably and signifi cantly more visible than it would have been when the
    vehicle was manufactured and supplied with the fuel recommended by the manufacturer (Note 4).
    Quote Originally Posted by skidmark
    This world has lost it's drive, everybody just wants to fit in the be the norm as it were.
    Quote Originally Posted by Phil Vincent
    The manufacturers go to a lot of trouble to find out what the average rider prefers, because the maker who guesses closest to the average preference gets the largest sales. But the average rider is mainly interested in silly (as opposed to useful) “goodies” to try to kid the public that he is riding a racer

  9. #24
    And most 2 strokes will smoke less then when they were new because the oil these days is so much better.When they ran on SAE30 at 16:1 it was a real smoke screen.Same engine at 40:1 or 50:1 on synth will be almost smokeless.

  10. #25
    Join Date
    8th August 2004 - 17:16
    Bike
    1999 GSXR1100W, 1975 CT90
    Location
    Upper Hutt
    Posts
    5,551
    As I understood it, the production of a vehicle sends out more toxic gas than the vehicle will ever pump out in it's lifetime. Basically making the idea of disposing of an old vehicle for one that emits less toxins ridiculous.

    Could relate to 2 stokes. Since they're easier to rebuild an owner may keep it longer.


    By the way, would I really help save the planet by getting a scooter?

  11. #26
    Join Date
    26th September 2007 - 13:52
    Bike
    Scorpio
    Location
    Tapu te Ranga
    Posts
    1,471
    Quote Originally Posted by Motu View Post
    Frankly Badjelly....I don't give a damn.Riding a 2 stroke is worth all the black looks and talking behind my back - riding bikes is all about having fun,and shit...nothing is as much fun as a 2 stroke motorcycle!
    One person who doesn't give a damn, no problem. A million people who don't give a damn and you get serious air pollution. Some people do give a damn about that.

  12. #27
    Join Date
    26th September 2007 - 13:52
    Bike
    Scorpio
    Location
    Tapu te Ranga
    Posts
    1,471
    Quote Originally Posted by Coyote View Post
    As I understood it, the production of a vehicle sends out more toxic gas than the vehicle will ever pump out in it's lifetime. Basically making the idea of disposing of an old vehicle for one that emits less toxins ridiculous.
    Got anything to back that up? I doubt it, myself, but I don't have anything to back that up right now.

    There's toxins and there's toxins. The specific toxin (well, class of chemicals, some of which may be toxic) that two-strokes put out in large quantities is hydrocarbons from the unburned (or partially burned) fuel and oil. I don't think vehicle manufacture does result in any significant amount of hydrocarbons in the air.

  13. #28
    Join Date
    26th September 2007 - 13:52
    Bike
    Scorpio
    Location
    Tapu te Ranga
    Posts
    1,471
    Quote Originally Posted by Motu View Post
    And most 2 strokes will smoke less then when they were new because the oil these days is so much better.When they ran on SAE30 at 16:1 it was a real smoke screen.Same engine at 40:1 or 50:1 on synth will be almost smokeless.
    Good point. I'd like to learn more about the factors effecting 2-stroke emissions. I think the unburnt oil ends up as smoke, but there's also quite a lot of unburnt fuel that is invisible. One of the references I found yesterday said that 30% of the fuel that goes into a 2-stroke comes out unburnt. That's mind-boggling! (But I need to find a better source before I'll believe that number.)

  14. #29
    Join Date
    26th September 2007 - 13:52
    Bike
    Scorpio
    Location
    Tapu te Ranga
    Posts
    1,471
    Quote Originally Posted by jcupit69 View Post
    It was a shame when the emissions laws stopped most companies from producing the bigger 2 strokes, personally i love them 2 bits
    Was it really the emissions laws that stopped most companies from producing the bigger 2 strokes? (I'm thinking of the the time when mainstream bikes like Suzuki T500, GT550, GT750, Kwaka H1, H2 were two-stroke, not so much the later, sharper vehicles like Yamaha RD350LC, Suzuki RG250.) I think it was more that the customers didn't want them. But I must admit I don't really know.

    I quite liked my Suzuki GT250K, though I did get embarrassed when I opened the throttle and it left a smoke trail you could walk on!

  15. #30
    Join Date
    4th May 2006 - 21:21
    Bike
    2006 BMW F800ST
    Location
    Southland
    Posts
    4,916
    My dad bought a 2 stroke car in 1973. Even then he told me never to stand behind it when the engine was running otherwise I would stand a good chance of death by toxic inhalation. He used to carry huge quantities of 2T oil around. 993cc 2T engine.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	fs_wartburg_tourist__4_.jpg 
Views:	7 
Size:	48.7 KB 
ID:	88973  
    In space, no one can smell your fart.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •