Yeah but you ride a Harley.
For me it's different in the car. I can stick to 100 easily, until I get held up by slow BMW/Pajero/Libero...or whatever drivers. I dont do the texting while driving. Hell I dont even tune my radio for fear of drifting over the road. Ive only ever had speeding tickets on my bike and its always less than 20ks over and never a risk to other road users.
Funny, I took my boys to Taupo in the car a couple of weeks ago and my 10 year old told me he feels safer on the back of my bike than in the car. I feel the same.
I laughed when I read that - Mrs R. and I notice that whenever they put an anti drink advert on the telly we are reminded to top up our drinks !
And those damn signs that tell you how fast you are going - don't you feel like a failure if they aren't flashing "slow down" ? Nothing worse than realising you have been driving to the conditions, not the speed limit and may have slipped down to 95 ! Time to check that speedo and gas it !
David must play fair with the other kids, even the idiots.
Or on a BMW. With the screen up, there is no perceptable difference between , say, 80kph and 130kph. There is a slight difference in the noise of the tyres on the road at higher speeds (which is the only noise that is noticeable), but it is MUCH less than the difference caused by different seal surfaces, so offers no indication of speed. Which is one reason why I usually ride with the screen down, so increasing wind noise gives a speed indication.
Originally Posted by skidmark
Originally Posted by Phil Vincent
Sorry delboy, my understanding of the definition of crime in this country is any indictable offence.
An often used way of defining (but technically incorrect) also includes summary offences, which basically means any offence which gets brought before a court.
10kph over will not get you before a court unless you are also driving dangerously but then that will be a separate charge, though i believe (could be wrong) that is still a summary offence and uber-technically still not a crime.
So even in the broader accepted defintion, speeding is not a crime.
And therefore one could if so inclined argue that police resources are often allocated to non-criminal offences above criminal ones......![]()
And therefore one could if so inclined argue that police resources are often allocated to non-criminal offences above criminal ones......[/QUOTE]
Yes, the police do non-criminal stuff. Like teaching kids not to smoke. It's called the DARE programme.
It's non criminal, so now tell me we shouldn't have cops in schools telling kids how to live their lives.
Speeding is a "Traffic Infringement". Criminal is when you dont pay the fine.
10 km over WILL get you before the court, if you wish to argue the case.
Highway Patrol staff are usually allocated to traffic duties with general duties staff "helping" when silly people are seen doing silly things. Or in the less populated areas. That is MY understanding, I may be corrected on this.
AND Broadly accepted, doesn't make it fact
When life throws you a curve ... Lean into it ...
TOP QUOTE: “The problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other people’s money.”
You were saying...
Crime is the breach of a rule or law for which a punishment may ultimately be prescribed by some governing authority or force. The word crime originates from the Latin crimen (genitive criminis), from the Latin root cernō and Greek κρινω = "I judge". Originally it meant "charge (in law), guilt, accusation."
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks