The thing that pisses me off about the traffic laws is the inconsistencies and here is an example...
A guy on a bike does a u-turn before a checkpoint(for whatever reason, not because he feels 'GUILTY', he may have suddenly remembered he left the oven on with a pot of oil to cook up some chips) and the cops assume he has something to hide...like hes pissed as a maggot for instance. So they chase him down, even though hes done NOTHING ILLEGAL.
right in ya face when you dont need em.
... but on the other side of the coin....
A woman rings her ex-hubby and makes a covert threat shes gonna do him in in the next day or two. He rings the cops coz hes shitting himself knowing full well that shes well capable of it coz shes held a knife up to his throat in the past. The cop on the other end of the phone says..."sorry mate, we cant go and arrest her..she hasnt done anything illegal and you have no proof she threatened to kill you. She then drives past his place a few times and rings his phone repeatedly. Same answer.."Sorry mate, shes done nothing illegal"
Next day the police are investigating a homicide.
...never there when you need em.
So on one hand the police are powerless to act, but on the other, they are all over the bike guy's ass because he looked suspicious doing the u-turn.
So is traffic law different than non-traffic law? and if so, why? Can our resident scum(dog) explain? or is he only allowed to know about the mysteries of traffic law being a lowly member of the gestapo lol!
mmmmm....funny old world we live in eh.

Bookmarks