and crash barrier design accounts for up to 1 in 6 of these......
http://www.motorcycle-usa.com/285/21...uary-2009.aspx
and crash barrier design accounts for up to 1 in 6 of these......
http://www.motorcycle-usa.com/285/21...uary-2009.aspx
- He felt that his whole life was some kind of dream and he sometimes wondered whose it was and whether they were enjoying it.
Fatalities!
If motorcyclists are 1% of total crashes then we would conclude motorcycles are safe.
What are you trying to say.
Dont take your statistic out of context.
He's not trying to say anything, as such. We all know the consequences of a motorcycle accident are potentially far more serious than an equivalent crash in a car.
Thanks for posting that SPMan. Isn't it interesting that with 'smooth' barriers in France, deaths have been halved??
Do you realise how many holes there could be if people would just take the time to take the dirt out of them?
Here's another article about the report, with a more detailed summary of its main points
http://www.ma.org.au/Content/MA/Ride...nviro_News.htm
The original PDF is supposed to be here
http://www.eurorap.org/library/pdfs/20081202_Bikers.PDF
but I'm getting timeouts when I try to download it (the EuroRAP site is down).
Here is the original, in case others have timeouts
Might be worth sending this to Mr Joyce I think.
EDIT Garrggh. It's too big. I'll have to split it up.
Originally Posted by skidmark
Originally Posted by Phil Vincent
(In the absence of other info) I'd have thought that at 16% of all road fatalities and only 1% of all road accidents, motorcycles would appear (statistically speaking) to be (a tad) harder to survive a crash on
- a useful, but no doubt hard to establish (with any confidence) figure might be the % of bike accidents that are fatal ...
especially as a big % don't get reported cos no one got hurt and no one wanted a ticket
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks