did he pull you over? write you a ticket for anything?. He made you paranoid so you obeyed the speed limit? I am trying to work out exactly what the problem is.
did he pull you over? write you a ticket for anything?. He made you paranoid so you obeyed the speed limit? I am trying to work out exactly what the problem is.
The cop pulled into the passing lane and drove at the same speed as the vehicles he'd previously been following at 20km/h and you think that's not a problem? Where does the OP say he was either speeding or needed to speed to overtake? I call what the cop did, if he did it with the intention of simply getting in the OP's way, bullying pure & simple because as I've already pointed out no matter how many objective laws you're obeying if they get the pip with you they can always find something to cost you time & money. If the cop did it unintentionally, he's not much of a driver being so oblivious to the presence of other road users.
If it wasn't for a concise set of rules, we might have to resort to common sense!
Its just a retarded cop who thinks he owns the road, like all damn cops.
Just and update.
Phoned the IPCA yesterday. Guy asked all the detials, and then said he would like my details, Name, number, Diver license details, vehicle details. I then kindly informed him, nope sorry as there is no proof that i would not be targeted for victimisation by said cop.
Can see myself getting pulled over every morning for anything from waering the wrong underwear to unclipped toe nails ...
... and that's what I think.
Or summat.
Or maybe not...
Dunno really....![]()
A bike shouldn't need a passing lane to get through traffic. There is a biker cop in Wellington who is a bit of a wanker about other bikers.
A good cop said to me once... "You have to feel sorry for cops. the only friends they have are other cops. And who wants a cop for a friend?"
Don't wave at cops unless you know them personally. They inevitably assume you are winding them up...
Last edited by Freshh2o; 3rd March 2009 at 09:39. Reason: wrong spot...
Yep agree. There is a reason why everyone was staying in the left lane and leaving the right lane empty. All it takes is one person to bust out and start a stampede up the right lane which just ends up causing more frustration from people pushing in.
Good work on the cops part for seeing this unfold and putting a stop to it.
Remember it's not all about you! Neither is it a bike thing as I'm sure the cop would've done the same thing if you were in a car. Managing the flow of traffic is their job. However if you believe that all "traffic flow management" decisions only apply to cars and you should be exempt because you ride a motorcycle then normally I'd agree but in this case where you are doing something likely to encourage other drivers to do something they shouldn't then you need to be roped in.
Indeed? I thought it was enforcing the law. If managing the flow of traffic is their job theiy're do a bloody crap job of it.
I am still struggling with (a) how two lanes can be slower than one lane ; and (b) if so, why are we taxpayers paying to build lanes which it is argued should not be used.
Originally Posted by skidmark
Originally Posted by Phil Vincent
"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin (1706-90)
"I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending to much liberty than those attending too small a degree of it." - Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826)
"Motorcycling is not inherently dangerous. It is, however, EXTREMELY unforgiving of inattention, ignorance, incompetence and stupidity!" - Anonymous
"Live to Ride, Ride to Live"
Yep, if I were the cop I would've let the bike go past (since it has minimal effect on traffic flow) and then block any car that tried to follow. However I can understand why the cop would choose to block the bike i.e. treat all road users as being equal and letting everyone know that the right lane is NOT quicker.
I didn't even know about it until I had the misfortune to experience it first hand. In heavy traffic two lanes aren't necessarily slower, they just aren't any faster! Only applies when traffic is at a crawl to heavy - usually public holiday peak time. Basically two lanes become ineffective as you have to merge back into one lane at the end. If there isn't enough space and vehicles have to slow to merge back into one lane then this causes a jam. Once the jam backs up to the beginning of the passing lane then there is no benefit with splitting into two lanes and then merging back into the same spots later on. So everyone accepts a "gentlemans agreement" to stay in one lane thereby eliminating all the unpleasant pushing 'n shoving.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks