Yeah, exactly my point. The triples were neither new in concept nor earth-changing; the CX turbo proved to be part of a technological cul-de-sac, and was interesting only as a great example of Honda achieving a difficult engineering exercise on a production basis; the dry-sump fours did change the face of motorcycling, but in themselves were a prime example of a successful new combination of old ideas.
Now, you and I could toss our ideas around between each other for ever and a day, but there's not actually a "right" or a "wrong" with opinions. (It's opinions expressed as fact that wind me up: see many of the threads on this forum...).
Bookmarks