Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 39 of 39

Thread: Tyre size dilemma: Bigger = more stability?

  1. #31
    Join Date
    27th January 2005 - 18:09
    Bike
    95 honda cbr900rr 05 zx6rr 89gsxr750
    Location
    papatoetoe
    Posts
    273
    Try driving an empty long wheelbase hi roof Hiace van over the bridge on a windy day , it moves around a lot more then my 'blabe but the blade moves more then the missus's MR2

  2. #32
    Join Date
    4th October 2008 - 16:35
    Bike
    R1250GS
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    10,241
    in my experience my k100rs was only a liitle worse in cross winds than my previuos(same generation) nakeds,but was 1000 times nicer in any other wind condition for a long trip

  3. #33
    Join Date
    26th February 2005 - 15:10
    Bike
    Ubrfarter V Klunkn,ffwabbit,Petal,phoebe
    Location
    In the cave of Adullam
    Posts
    13,624
    von Klunken is a KRT BMW. Barndoor fairing as big as they come. Rock solid steady in any wind, nothing moves it. Best bike I've ever had for wind.

    So it's not *just* fairing = bad for wind.
    Quote Originally Posted by skidmark
    This world has lost it's drive, everybody just wants to fit in the be the norm as it were.
    Quote Originally Posted by Phil Vincent
    The manufacturers go to a lot of trouble to find out what the average rider prefers, because the maker who guesses closest to the average preference gets the largest sales. But the average rider is mainly interested in silly (as opposed to useful) “goodies” to try to kid the public that he is riding a racer

  4. #34
    Join Date
    19th September 2008 - 21:09
    Bike
    04' ZXr6
    Location
    castor bay, north shore
    Posts
    61
    Quote Originally Posted by DEATH_INC. View Post
    I can sort the sidewind-fairing-weight-tyrewidth thing easy, the WORST bike I've ever ridden in a sidewind was My ZX12, with it's large aerodynamic fairing, 210kg dry (rider around 100kg then...) and a 200 rear tyre. Almost dangerous in any sidewind with any force. I'd rather ride a KR150 in fact...
    Just wondering how would that be the case? Wouldn't the extra weight ~310kg help to plant the bike in ?? going to upgrade to a zx6r soon so hopefully it won't fair too bad in the wind... I have got to cross the harbour bridge everyday

  5. #35
    Join Date
    23rd April 2006 - 15:27
    Bike
    cbr 600f
    Location
    Palmerston North
    Posts
    48
    I find narrower tyre = quicker turning and generally more fun.

  6. #36
    Join Date
    26th February 2005 - 11:00
    Bike
    Two triples
    Location
    Bugtussle
    Posts
    2,982
    Quote Originally Posted by scracha View Post
    Belgian motorways were much the same too. Kinda weird crusing along a motorway at about 130 with your bike constantly 'listing' at about 20 degrees. Was OK as long as no sudden gusts happened.
    Do they still have ditches on both sides of the roads,so their knuckles don't drag on the ground?
    (old Dutch joke)

  7. #37
    Join Date
    30th March 2004 - 11:00
    Bike
    2001 RC46
    Location
    Norfshaw
    Posts
    10,455
    Blog Entries
    17
    Quote Originally Posted by cheshirecat View Post
    Be interesting to see if others have similar experience and on which bikes
    In the time I've lived in D'Auckland, I've ridden four (4) different bikes across the Harbour Bridge (5, if you count the Volty-horse loaner), in windy conditions. The bike and fairing make a big difference to the handling, and even things like the shape of the front mudguard has a bearing. The bikes were:
    1985 VF500 - has a bikini fairing
    1990 VFR750 - fully faired
    1998 VTR1000 - bikini fairing again
    2001 VFR800 - fully faired.

    Of these, the VTR was probably the least susceptible to side gusts and the like. The fairing was narrow and provided less wind protection, but also had a smaller side profile. The front guard was also fairly minimalistic. The VF500 was similar, but lighter weight, and also had a more upright riding position, so the rider caught the wind more. The worst is the VFR800 - while it has a similar fairing to the VFR750, there is some weird shit happening with the front end - I think it's a combination of aerodynamics between the fairing and mudguard, and all the extra DCBS stuff on the front left fork catching the wind. Riding north over the bridge in a south-easterly gale, the bike ends up weaving each time it goes past another section of bridge railing. Disconcerting, but not dangerous. Balancing that, the fairing is easy to get down behind, which aids the aerodynamics and minimalises drag on the rider, which is a significant part of the bike moving around in the wind, particularly if the rider tenses up and fights every little movement the wind produces.

    I strongly suspect nearly all tales of riders being "blown across the road" are due mainly to the rider trying to counteract the wind gusts, rather than letting the bike move around a bit. If you're counter-steering against a wind gust, when it drops off, you'll end up steering the bike, so the nett result is the bike's weaving a lot more than it should. If you relax, and look where you want to go, and don't panic if the bike leans under you, the bike may lean a bit, but will maintain a course basically where it should be going.

    The fairing does have a marked effect on wind resistance, which is why Casey Stoner first had holes cut in the Ducati's fairing for tracks with strong cross winds, then more recently, they completely redesigned the fairing to improve this
    ... and that's what I think.

    Or summat.


    Or maybe not...

    Dunno really....


  8. #38
    Join Date
    26th February 2005 - 11:00
    Bike
    Two triples
    Location
    Bugtussle
    Posts
    2,982
    Quote Originally Posted by Ixion View Post
    von Klunken is a KRT BMW. Barndoor fairing as big as they come. Rock solid steady in any wind, nothing moves it. Best bike I've ever had for wind.

    So it's not *just* fairing = bad for wind.
    Wheelbase,COG and steering geometry are the major factors in sidewind stability

  9. #39
    Join Date
    27th January 2005 - 17:04
    Bike
    1986 RZ350 + many others
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    724
    I would probably recommend a 250 4 stroke of some description for long distance touring like that.
    Two Stroke, the pinnacle of engine design

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •