maybe, but i'm damn sure i would and was on the front brake in less than 5.5 sec's and came to a halt in wayyyy less than 60m.
p.s i was only on an 80's xl125.
lesson learned,,check the oil level.
ed: if i haven't done something with the front brake within 2 sec's,it's time to stop riding
Last edited by piston broke; 30th April 2009 at 22:57. Reason: ed
forsale A100,awesome power.
near ready for bucket raceing,or just a padock,beach hack.
gotta be a good deal,surely
Main thing is they're both going to ride again! well maybe, who knows, but it's a nice change from " a motorcyclist hit a tree and died today"' and any other sort of accident involving motorcyclists, being reported by a news hungry press that doesn't care that the poor old biker got the raw end of the stick and became the meat in the sandwich.
Every day above ground is a good day!:
Indeed, but your front brake should still be working - so you can brake harder than that. Also, a locked up rear wheel providing half a gee of braking would be rather generous I think.
As has been said, pulling the clutch might not release the rear-wheel if the internals have had a good buggering... however, if you can keep it upright for 60 meters you should be able to apply the front brake and scrub off some speed...
Also, the article only say that the bike stayed upright for 60 meters - nothing about how fast it was going when it tipped over.
Not that all of this matters - main thing is that everyone survived to ride another day.
It is preferential to refrain from the utilisation of grandiose verbiage in the circumstance that your intellectualisation can be expressed using comparatively simplistic lexicological entities. (...such as the word fuck.)
Remember your humanity, and forget the rest. - Joseph Rotblat
A girlfriend once asked " Why is it you seem to prefer to race, than spend time with me ?"
The answer was simple ! "I'll prolly get bored with racing too, once i've nailed it !"
Bowls can wait !
I know very little about Ducati motorcycles but four stroke internal combustion engines in general are something I know a bit about. I can't imagine why a broken con rod would cause a siezed transmission, unless the transmission is directly below (or closely adjacent to) the contents of the crankcase. I doubt that.
Comments have been made relating to pistons detaching themselves from crankshafts. It doesn't happen, ever. The reason is.... the piston is attached to a connnecting rod. The piston can become detached from the rod and the rod from the crankshaft but not the piston from the crank.
All things being equal and the makeup of the Duke's mechanicals being similar to most other motorcycles I'd say if the engine dropped a rod and the engine locked up then surely by pulling in the clutch you can coast to a stop with the dead engine being simply that; dead.
Moons ago I threw the rods on a 650 Triumph, both came out of the front of the cases at once. I over-revved it in 3rd gear on the Hutt M'way. I grabbed the clutch and coasted to a halt without a skidmark on the road (but a size L one in my panties). The most dangerous thing that happened was getting engine oil on the back tyre.
A broken con rod caused the trans to lock up? Hmmm. Email that to Ducati and see what they say.
Rant over.
to be fair, we are assuming the reportergot all the details right. which doesnt happen often...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks