Say... wha...?
You're in UnZud now - spouik Kouiwuoi (as you West Islanders are wont to say).
Myis that I'm sick of all the media hooplah and crapola being spouted about Globular Yawning. Not only is it unbalanced, ill-researched and alarmist, human activity has such a pathetically small possible effect on climate change as to be negligible and discountable. There's WAY too much of jumping on the latest populist bandwagon, rather than properly researching the alramist propaganda they're trotting out whenever there's a slow news day. Plus I realised long ago (and this is why I haven't worked in science for the last 25 years or so) that scientific process is deeply flawed, and that scientists can't follow true scientific process without being swayed by political and monetary concerns.
Yes, it's good to have concern for the environment we live in, and not pollute it / exploit it / trash it, but 6 years of drinking beer ... ah... studying Earth Sciences learned me Some Stuff. Like, we don't really even begin to understand natural mechanisms of climate change, and that prehistoric and historic fluctuations have been much, MUCH huger than any "they" are now trying to attribute to cows farting and car emissions.
Blah blah blah... look - you've done it now. Got me all hot under the collar (that must've melted a few baby polar bears and drowned a few Inuit). You shoulda just left me at.
![]()
... and that's what I think.
Or summat.
Or maybe not...
Dunno really....![]()
catalyst |ˈkatl-ist| noun a substance that increases the rate of a chemical reaction without itself undergoing any permanent chemical change. • figurative a person or thing that precipitates an event : the governor's speech acted as a catalyst for debate. ORIGIN early 20th cent.: from catalysis , on the pattern of analyst.
Now on the news today some Insurance companies are saying that they may not insure coastal holiday homes.
Next they will be saying they won't cover us for storm damage.
I am led to believe that this is a fallacy. Desalination plants take a fair bit of electricity to run.
Where the electrical supply has a significant thermal generation base, then the cooling systems of the generation plants use more water than the desalination plants that they run, can produce - ie net reduction in available water
I am undecided about the climatic effects of human activities. However, it is true that as temperatures rise, CO2 is also forced out of solution in the oceans and so there is POTENTIAL for a runaway effect.
The bit that I wonder about though, is that our major contributor to CO2 production is the burning of fossil fuels. Now as I understand it, fossil fuels originated from vegetation which in turn originated from atmosheric CO2 via photosynthesis. Therefore, when we burn fossil fuels, are we not just sticking the CO2 back where it came from in the first place?
TOP QUOTE: “The problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other people’s money.”
But the coolant water is still available for other purposes (eg irrigation) after it has done its coolant stuff. It just gets warmer, and then cools down again. So you could run water through a electricity plant (or a hydro) , then use the cooled down water for irrigation/industry/anything else (with perhaps further treatment). And use the electricity to desalinate seawater to produce more fresh water
Originally Posted by skidmark
Originally Posted by Phil Vincent
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks