Scott Watson links

**Skyryder** · 12th May 2007, 20:52

I know Bain is getting all the publicity at the moment and rightly so but there is one other innocent 'doing bird.' Some interesting links here. Some deal with issues raised in Trial by Trickery, others not. Just come to you own conclusions as to guilt or innocence.

http://trudyandtom.tripod.com/index.htm

Skyryder

**98tls** · 12th May 2007, 20:57

Scott Watson is just where he deserves to be..........ive met him and hes a freak...............end of story.

**Skyryder** · 12th May 2007, 21:13

Originally Posted by 98tls

Scott Watson is just where he deserves to be..........ive met him and hes a freak...............end of story.

Yep just like a closed book.

Skyryder

**Maha** · 12th May 2007, 21:16

Cool thread...had a beginning...a middle and an end....

**98tls** · 12th May 2007, 21:20

Originally Posted by Skyryder

Yep just like a closed book.

Skyryder

Most people have only seen scott watson in a suit and tie on the six oclock news...pretty normal clean cut sort of bloke they must think.........truth is he was a F%@k up way before he did what he did............i cant honestly say i know he did it but i without a doubt believe the guy capable of doing it..if you knew the guy you would agree for sure...........

**oldrider** · 12th May 2007, 21:55

It's not a case of whether they did or didn't, it's a case of beyond all reasonable doubt! Tried and "true."

There are too many currently that are put away because they are silly buggers who fit the bill and were conveniently around at the time.

Bain, Watson, Tamaheri, Ellis even goes back to Arthur Allan Thomas, to name just a few and the fisherman on the West Coast who's name escapes me!

I make no judgement myself because I just don't know, I just feel ill at ease about the competence and quality of our judicial system and the quality of the policing involved.

Then you have the Corrections and the Parole board examples of late and the way authorities handle the gang situation in New Zealand, if this continues we (NZ) will be a world laughing stock!

Sorry but I don't think it's funny.

John.

**iwilde** · 12th May 2007, 23:16

I always wouldered, if those two kids were black and from poor families, would the police have treated the case differently? Mr Watson still might be free.

**Patrick** · 13th May 2007, 12:47

Originally Posted by iwilde

I always wouldered, if those two kids were black and from poor families, would the police have treated the case differently? Mr Watson still might be free.

NO??????????? He might not have killed a black poor couple...so maybe you are right...???

**Skyryder** · 13th May 2007, 14:20

This will take about three or four minites.

http://trudyandtom.tripod.com/pcacomp1.htm

Consider that the Crown spent two million on investigation and you begin to see why Popes integrity sailed away with the Mystery Yacht.

These lies can be proved 'beyond reasonable doubt.' To my knowledge the Crown has no interest in pursuing this any further. It is just too embarressing for both the judiciary and the police.

Skyryder

**Swoop** · 13th May 2007, 14:50

I intend to read the book quite soon.
There does seem to be, however, a distinct lack of credence placed on the boating fraternity and their evidence.
If a racer had his/her bike stolen and another racer said "yeah, it had ABC tyres, an ACME rear shock, XYZ fairings" etc, that would have some credence to it... yes?

**Patrick** · 14th May 2007, 14:11

Originally Posted by Skyryder

This will take about three or four minites.

http://trudyandtom.tripod.com/pcacomp1.htm

Consider that the Crown spent two million on investigation and you begin to see why Popes integrity sailed away with the Mystery Yacht.

These lies can be proved 'beyond reasonable doubt.' To my knowledge the Crown has no interest in pursuing this any further. It is just too embarressing for both the judiciary and the police.

Skyryder

"Family," I see??? "Clutching at straws" rings a bell...

**Skyryder** · 14th May 2007, 14:25

Originally Posted by Patrick

"Family," I see??? "Clutching at straws" rings a bell...

Well the dad has nothing to lose, but the 'fact' remains that Pope lied. Once you get into some of the finer detail there have been other instances of this sort of thing too. For instance court records show that Watson was convicted for burgely assault. When in fact his convictions were for burgerley, assault etc. The missing comma makes a lot of difference.. If memory serves me correctly these were eleven years 'prior' to the murders. Seems he had 'turned his life around somewhat.

Skyryder

**Patrick** · 14th May 2007, 15:05

Originally Posted by Skyryder

Well the dad has nothing to lose, but the 'fact' remains that Pope lied. Once you get into some of the finer detail there have been other instances of this sort of thing too. For instance court records show that Watson was convicted for burgely assault. When in fact his convictions were for burgerley, assault etc. The missing comma makes a lot of difference.. If memory serves me correctly these were eleven years 'prior' to the murders. Seems he had 'turned his life around somewhat.

Skyryder

That damn comma... guilty as sin then...!!! Especially for burgely... or burgerley....