Lying pig, scumbag filth

**peasea** · 26th May 2007, 21:10

Originally Posted by Storm

Its called incompetance mate. Sadly a regular feature of govt dept's these days

Errm, you're not wrong mate.

Trouble is; most kiwis roll over and go for the easy way out. That means pay the fine or whatever. I don't.

If they are going to look for the most miniscule infringement (as they often do, like 111kph) I'll look for their own miniscule cockup. You NEED to know your rights and you NEED to know THEIR procedures so that if they drop the ball you don't get screwed.

The best thing you can do is go and have a few beers with some cops, (I've done it heaps) get onside, be laid back, get the info and be better prepared. To know one's enemies is to be better armed.

Spy vs spy.

**Patrick** · 26th May 2007, 21:12

Originally Posted by peasea

Right; check this out!
Today I get some mail related to my PCA complaint, it reads;
"I have been instructed to investigate your complaint dated 17 July 2007".

So when that date occurs I'll be sure to lodge another one.

If this is the level of professionalism we're dealing with, what hope have I got?

Further to that my complaint has been assigned to someone who's about to go on leave. Then that particular Sgt requests contact details that I supplied on the original form.

WTF????

Probably a pre formatted standardised letter... don't lose sleep over it.

**peasea** · 26th May 2007, 21:15

Originally Posted by Patrick

Probably a pre formatted standardised letter... don't lose sleep over it.

Not me mate, just loading up.......

**98tls** · 26th May 2007, 21:26

Originally Posted by peasea

Errm, you're not wrong mate.

Trouble is; most kiwis roll over and go for the easy way out. That means pay the fine or whatever. I don't.

If they are going to look for the most miniscule infringement (as they often do, like 111kph) I'll look for their own miniscule cockup. You NEED to know your rights and you NEED to know THEIR procedures so that if they drop the ball you don't get screwed.

The best thing you can do is go and have a few beers with some cops, (I've done it heaps) get onside, be laid back, get the info and be better prepared. To know one's enemies is to be better armed.

Spy vs spy.

WTF.............you get nicked...........so what........you get nicked......man up and get on with it...........you kicked this thread off sounding like a complete cock so i will lower my response to your level and say if i were you i would be proud to get a speeding ticket on a lumbering piece of shit which you were riding..................

**peasea** · 26th May 2007, 21:37

Originally Posted by 98tls

WTF.............you get nicked...........so what........you get nicked......man up and get on with it...........you kicked this thread off sounding like a complete cock so i will lower my response to your level and say if i were you i would be proud to get a speeding ticket on a lumbering piece of shit which you were riding..................

Meeeoooow!

I don't diss your bike, grow up.

**spudchucka** · 26th May 2007, 21:54

Originally Posted by peasea

The best thing you can do is go and have a few beers with some cops, (I've done it heaps) get onside, be laid back, get the info and be better prepared.

Sort of like going under cover aye? That'll fuck em!

**peasea** · 26th May 2007, 22:13

Originally Posted by spudchucka

Sort of like going under cover aye? That'll fuck em!

Kinda, only less dangerous.

**scumdog** · 26th May 2007, 22:54

Originally Posted by peasea

Kinda, only less dangerous.

Who for, - the cops??

**idb** · 27th May 2007, 05:26

111km/hr = 11% over the limit.

**laRIKin** · 27th May 2007, 09:27

Originally Posted by peasea

Meeeoooow!

I don't diss your bike, grow up.

You miss the point.

**Patrick** · 27th May 2007, 11:16

Originally Posted by idb

111km/hr = 11% over the limit.

From memory, it was 111 in an 80 zone... but the problem was he got two of em after he "roared off" the first time and got snapped at exactly the same speed "alledgedly" while he roared off...

Have had a few do that,

but admittedly, not at the same speed as the 1st one tho... Can see why he is dubious, but can also see how it is possible...

**peasea** · 27th May 2007, 18:55

Originally Posted by scumdog

Who for, - the cops??

Oh yes, I'd never be a danger to them.

**peasea** · 27th May 2007, 18:56

Originally Posted by lemans

You miss the point.

Actually, no.

**peasea** · 27th May 2007, 18:58

Originally Posted by Patrick

From memory, it was 111 in an 80 zone... but the problem was he got two of em after he "roared off" the first time and got snapped at exactly the same speed "alledgedly" while he roared off...

Have had a few do that,

but admittedly, not at the same speed as the 1st one tho... Can see why he is dubious, but can also see how it is possible...

Dubious, yes, thank you.