Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 74

Thread: Honda VS Suzuki $$$

  1. #31
    Join Date
    12th August 2004 - 09:31
    Bike
    2013 EX300SE
    Location
    Top of the Gorge
    Posts
    1,511
    Suzuki also seem to have longer model runs than a lot of other manufacturers which probably keeps their costs down. Residuals are minimal.

    GS500's, SV's, and Bandits are good examples of this.

  2. #32
    Join Date
    30th March 2004 - 11:00
    Bike
    2001 RC46
    Location
    Norfshaw
    Posts
    10,455
    Blog Entries
    17
    Quote Originally Posted by merv View Post
    While I like Hondas, I have never understood Blue Wing Honda and its marketing strategies. ....

    I don't understand why Honda don't just take back the importing and do it themselves through Honda NZ
    Agreed.
    I was rather pleasantly surprised yesterday when ordering bike parts, that they actually had 4 of the 6 items I ordered in stock! Normally, it's invariably, "Sorry - not in stock; three weeks ex-Japan. Please pay up front." The other pleasant surprise (probably a factor of the crap exchange rate) was that it was actually cheaper to buy locally than from the US. My parts were US$86, plus (at a minimum) ~$20 postage (via a friend) or US$76 direct from the dealer. (So that's a range of NZ$165 to $250) Locally, they were a total of $141.
    In the past, the price discrepancies have been HUGE at times, like NZ prices (and delivery times) being 3 or 4 times bigger than obtaining via Interdweebland.

    I don't know if it's true, but Blue Wing's policies and actions give the impression of arrogance and lack of care about customer service. Sadly, some Honda dealers seem to exhibit the same attitude. It's a shame that some of the dealers who've gone belly-up recently seemed to have great customer service ethics yet not the financial wherewithall to back it up. I hope this doesn't mean that only the arseholes survive in the current climate...
    ... and that's what I think.

    Or summat.


    Or maybe not...

    Dunno really....


  3. #33
    Join Date
    4th October 2008 - 16:35
    Bike
    R1250GS
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    10,285
    doesnt worry me...i wouldnt have a suzuki if you paid me.I can offer absolutely no sane reason for that attitude.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    23rd February 2007 - 08:47
    Bike
    Blandit 1200, DRZ250 K, Beta xtrainer
    Location
    CHCH
    Posts
    2,130
    I was recently lured back from the "green side" by Suzukis aggressive pricing, and a realistic trade in deal to boot. It helps that I like Suzukis and they seem to suit me, but it was the $$ and a Dealer that was prepared to work to get the sale that made it happen. I am afraid the Honda people were not even in the running price wise.

  5. #35
    Join Date
    3rd December 2006 - 12:36
    Bike
    POS 750cc+ bike, Suzuki DRZ400
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    1,036
    Quote Originally Posted by BMWST? View Post
    doesnt worry me...i wouldnt have a suzuki if you paid me.I can offer absolutely no sane reason for that attitude.
    I would suggest crossing to the dark side and finding a Japanese bike you like and riding one for awhile. Apparently that answers all questions you might have.
    A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single motorcycle

    Click here for: - Changing Dyslexia, Depression, Anxiety, Trauma, Phobia's, Allergies etc

  6. #36
    Join Date
    4th October 2008 - 16:35
    Bike
    R1250GS
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    10,285
    Quote Originally Posted by Mystic13 View Post
    I would suggest crossing to the dark side and finding a Japanese bike you like and riding one for awhile. Apparently that answers all questions you might have.
    4 honda,4 yamaha,1 kawasaki,2 bmw and 1 ducati,gives me some perspective

  7. #37
    Join Date
    29th November 2007 - 07:08
    Bike
    Triumph Daytona 1050 - one of a kind
    Location
    Pakuranga
    Posts
    289
    Quote Originally Posted by p.dath View Post
    Sometimes it's easy to focus on what you get immediately and forget about everything your going to need. For example a higher price may reflect a vendor stocking spare parts in NZ or perhaps a better warranty.
    what he said - why do you naturally expect manufacturers to only complete on price and Suzuki have always focussed in price to keep market share

  8. #38
    Join Date
    24th August 2006 - 18:00
    Bike
    ZZR1100 D7
    Location
    Counties
    Posts
    679
    This time last year I reckon it was Yamaha that was overpriced esp. the models I was looking at.

    At 23k the FJR1300 was looking like a good buy but they threw on ABS and bumped the rrp to 30k. That put it into another part of the market.

    That's the trouble with Honda today, bumping up their prices without offering anything extra. Suzuki and Kawasaki seem to offer the best bang for the buck atm at least for big bikes.

  9. #39
    Join Date
    29th May 2008 - 09:58
    Bike
    Suzuki SV650 S
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    56
    I'm looking at moving upto a 600 from a 250 in the next few weeks and Suzuki and Kawasaki are really the only options for me.

    Would love to replace my Honda with another Honda but there is nothing that I can come close too other than second hand bikes pre 2000. Whereas I think I can get a decent SV or ER6 around 2005 for 6-7k.

  10. #40
    Join Date
    4th January 2005 - 18:50
    Bike
    Massey ferguson 7495 dyna-vt
    Location
    Norfland
    Posts
    6,917
    Quote Originally Posted by shafty View Post
    I think Honda DO trade on their reputation for quality, and probably aren't so worried about being a sales leader rather than maintaining a healthy GP (Gross profit), after all, anyone can lead a sales race and lose $$
    They going broke...exit F1...slow GP bike...probally ditch that too...got to make money out of their average product some how???!!?
    Quote Originally Posted by Drew View Post
    Given the short comings of my riding style, it doesn't matter what I'm riding till I've got my shit in one sock.

  11. #41
    Join Date
    11th June 2007 - 13:16
    Bike
    1997 Honda CB400
    Location
    Henderson
    Posts
    40
    Quote Originally Posted by Finn View Post
    Welcome to my first serious post.

    Just having a look on the dotcom at new bikes and not that I would buy either of these bikes now (have owned an 05 CBR1000rr before) but there seems to be a massive difference in cost between their flagship models.

    Suzuki GSX-R1000 is $21,000
    Honda CBR1000RR is $27,000

    What? While I would be prepared to pay a little bit more for Honda quality () I wouldn't think that it's worth $6000 more.

    Someone is missing the boat.
    I hear ya Finn. I've been wanting to upgrade to a sports/tourer for quite some time now - lack of funds is why I haven't.

    The two bikes I've been comparing are the Suzuki GSX750 and the Honda VFR800. Obvious differences between the two bikes aside I have seen the Suzuki retail for around $10k brand new and the Honda at $17k. I prefer the look of the VFR and it has slightly better technology but the price of the Suzuki has almost persuaded to me to go in that direction.

    I think Suzuki brand's itself as a bike for the masses. Higher volume/supply at reasonable prices (certainly no problem with quality) and Honda is going for the lower supply (supply and demand) and perceived better quality.

    My 2c worth.

  12. #42
    Join Date
    31st March 2005 - 02:18
    Bike
    CB919, 1090R, R1200GSA
    Location
    East Aucks
    Posts
    10,502
    Blog Entries
    140
    I think part of the issue for Honda is that often the parts on their bike are made from better materials, higher quality etc, and over the list of parts for the bike, it starts getting expensive fast.

    That said, Suzuki is waaaaay more expensive, since each rider buys at least 3 don't they?

    Yes, the Honda's are expensive, and the problem is, their bikes are entering different markets, which makes it difficult to compete, with essentially, a jap bike.

    ie, the predator is what, 22k now? for 24k, I can get a KTM 990 Superduke or Supermoto, probably a Supermoto T as well... bit of a no brainer... Around that is the Speed Triple as well.
    Quote Originally Posted by Jane Omorogbe from UK MSN on the KTM990SM
    It's barking mad and if it doesn't turn you into a complete loon within half an hour of cocking a leg over the lofty 875mm seat height, I'll eat my Arai.

  13. #43
    Join Date
    25th December 2003 - 20:57
    Bike
    None
    Location
    NZ
    Posts
    2,271
    Quote Originally Posted by geoffm View Post
    Honda's silly pricing is why I have a SV dather than the VFR800 i nearly bought - $5k difference was to much.

    IMO Triumph priceing is even more out there.
    HONDA CBR600RR 2009 - $20,950

    TRIUMPH DAYTONA 675 2009 - $17,990

    HONDA CBR1000RR 2009 - $26,950

    TRIUMPH SPEED TRIPLE 2009 - $19,990

    Granted the latter two arn't in the same category.

    -Indy
    Hey, kids! Captain Hero here with Getting Laid Tip 213 - The Backrub Buddy!

    Find a chick who’s just been dumped and comfort her by massaging her shoulders, and soon, she’ll be massaging your prostate.


  14. #44
    Join Date
    7th November 2008 - 13:30
    Bike
    2007 GSX1000R
    Location
    Hastings
    Posts
    2,140
    The better bike is Suzuki..... go GSXR's!!!!!

  15. #45
    Join Date
    15th September 2004 - 22:33
    Bike
    Hornet 900
    Location
    Capital town
    Posts
    3,471
    $17,500 for a K8 GSXR 1000 at Wellington Motorcycles.

    That is a pretty damn good price.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •