so all i'm doing in fact, is assigning a descriptive word to you based on the oxford and your posts
yes, there are shades of grey
Robert "The Weasel" Muldoon
Rodney "The Jeykel" Hyde
Hone "The White M***** F******" Harawira
who gives a .......
so all i'm doing in fact, is assigning a descriptive word to you based on the oxford and your posts
yes, there are shades of grey
So you're all for modern definitions when it comes to the political compass, but you don't like it when it hurts your precious lefty credentials?
It's a true recognition of the fact that rather than being polar opposites Hitler and Stalin were pretty much the same thing approached from different directions...
oh dear, more non sequiters
i'm a liberal and by that definition, progressive and accepting, but that doesn't mean i accept propagandist manipulation of word definitions
please, refrain from straw men and other fallacy argument tactics
for those interested in spotting bullshit arguments:
one of the best sites on the internet: http://www.fallacyfiles.org/
Verbose with breathtaking arrogance. ''The ways and views of the left are the only correct way'' ( apparently )
In my world the most agreeable conservatives are those who embrace good change but are not predisposed to change for changes sake.
Must way to pursue more dirty filthy capitalist pursuits..............
Rattle on all you like Idioticlefty, it is your incessant and protracted ramblings that are a joke.
Bull and shit.
Classical liberalism
You're the one with the propagandist word stealing. Progressive, change for the sake of change, social engineering...I'll let you keep that one.
As per usual you have no idea what your are on about.
Modern liberalism has it’s roots in the Age of Enlightenment. A term used to describe the western culture at a time in the 18 century where much change in the form of personal liberty was evolving from the Divine Right of Kings i.e. the American War of Independence. John Lock proposed it’s philosophical foundations in that he believed ‘no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty, or possessions.’ This was a political philosophy.
The libertarians have hijacked this and turned this into an economic theory in which they believe this to be true for themselves but not for those that come from a less endowed social position.
Skyryder
Free Scott Watson.
The (dis)honorable Nick Smith, when you speak all I can hear is
BULLSHIT!! BULLSHIT!! BULLSHIT!! BULLSHIT!! BULLSHIT!! BULLSHIT!! BULLSHIT!!
So please fuck off and die.
Go Go, Ninja Dinosaur!!
Oh come on, you can't separate "political" and "economic".
I'm sticking by my postion that to equate the term "liberal" with the kind of big-state social engineering that characterised the last decade in this country is stupid.
Also, while you're banging on about social position, I will make the point that a liberal wish for equality of opportunity doesn't have much to do with the socialist / progressive (yay for Jim's vanity party!) wish for equality of outcome (oh, and my own Grandfather's first job was shifting pit-props on Hull docks, so lay off with the working class hero stuff).
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks