Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 37

Thread: Rear suspension sag?

  1. #16
    Join Date
    2nd March 2004 - 13:00
    Bike
    FransAlp 700
    Location
    Nelson
    Posts
    14,484
    Get a copy of "Dual Sport Suspension" by Ned Suesse (Neduro) & James Siddall (Super Plush Suspension).

  2. #17
    Join Date
    26th January 2008 - 07:37
    Bike
    91 R80GS
    Location
    Nelson
    Posts
    5,225
    Is it possible to get more travel out of suspension without raising seat height? I had a look under gonzo & wondered how other bikes get longer travel with a linkage setup.

    If we're comparing to mountain bikes the KLR, Dr etc have a 4 bar linkage such as Giant, Specialised etc, KTM, I take it, have their shock less linkages such as like my Santa Cruz?

    Has anyone succesfully got more rear travel without putting their heads above the clouds?

    Any helpful links would be appreciated

    BTW hows the ricor rear going Mark?

  3. #18
    Join Date
    30th March 2007 - 18:18
    Bike
    KLR650 WR450
    Location
    Kapiti
    Posts
    2,665
    Quote Originally Posted by Padmei View Post
    BTW hows the ricor rear going Mark?
    its not

    I spent the day following my son around the Mungatooks on trail bikes.

    I'll take it somewhere lumpy next weekend and give it a decent test out

  4. #19
    Join Date
    26th January 2008 - 07:37
    Bike
    91 R80GS
    Location
    Nelson
    Posts
    5,225
    What brand fork oil did you use with your intimators?

  5. #20
    Join Date
    30th March 2007 - 18:18
    Bike
    KLR650 WR450
    Location
    Kapiti
    Posts
    2,665
    Quote Originally Posted by Padmei View Post
    What brand fork oil did you use with your intimators?
    Spectro 5W

    did you check you had the right size iniminators?

  6. #21
    Join Date
    26th January 2008 - 07:37
    Bike
    91 R80GS
    Location
    Nelson
    Posts
    5,225
    Yep just gonna change the oil & go from there. Now back to the scheduled programme.

  7. #22
    Join Date
    15th August 2004 - 17:52
    Bike
    KTM 2T & LC4
    Location
    Rather be riding
    Posts
    3,326
    Quote Originally Posted by Padmei View Post
    Is it possible to get more travel out of suspension without raising seat height? I had a look under gonzo & wondered how other bikes get longer travel with a linkage setup.

    If we're comparing to mountain bikes the KLR, Dr etc have a 4 bar linkage such as Giant, Specialised etc, KTM, I take it, have their shock less linkages such as like my Santa Cruz?
    In a word... no. The only way you'll get more travel is by extending the wheels down (lengthening the forks and the stroke of the shock) because there's no room to extend upwards - the wheels will hit the guards and the bash plate will deck out at full compression.

    The linkages don't really have much bearing on the travel, in the sense that they might limit or extend how much you can have - they don't. They really achieve two things: give you a rising rate on the spring force so that the suspension firms up as it moves through its stroke (this is what lowering links corrupt), and multiplies the shock travel vs axle travel - usually at around 1:3 - so you can have a smaller shock.

    btw the KTM's have linkages... that is one of the differences between the gentle LC4 (& LC8) and the hard-out off-road bikes which don't. And after ten years of trying to get the PDS system to work really well, the latest KTM has linkages again.
    Last edited by warewolf; 7th December 2009 at 09:57. Reason: LC8 is PDS
    Cheers,
    Colin

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve McQueen
    All racers I know aren't in it for the money. They race because it's something inside of them... They're not courting death. They're courting being alive.

  8. #23
    Join Date
    27th September 2008 - 18:14
    Bike
    SWM RS 650R
    Location
    Richmond
    Posts
    3,816
    I seen a thread somewhere where a guy put a linkless set up on his klr. It was not straight forward apparently. The raising link I got on mine has certainly stopped the rear from bottoming out nearly as much, and also I have added more dampening since fitting it so the ride is a bit plusher too.e.g. less pogo stick like. But the bike does sit about an inch higher so is quite tallish now.
    I mentioned vegetables once, but I think I got away with it...........

  9. #24
    Join Date
    30th March 2007 - 18:18
    Bike
    KLR650 WR450
    Location
    Kapiti
    Posts
    2,665
    Quote Originally Posted by Woodman View Post
    But the bike does sit about an inch higher so is quite tallish now.
    it seems to need it though

    the biggest problem I have with mine is smacking the under bits into things when the suspension fully compresses

    I'm hoping the more controlled rikor bits will reduce the 'blow through the suspension travel - bang - something else underneath breaks' stuff

    maybe I should stay away from the triples only do single backflips

  10. #25
    Join Date
    26th September 2005 - 21:14
    Bike
    05 450 EXC, 990 S
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    3,642
    Quote Originally Posted by warewolf View Post
    ....btw the KTM's have linkages... that is one of the differences between the gentle LC4 (& LC8) and the hard-out off-road bikes which don't. And after ten years of trying to get the PDS system to work really well, the latest KTM has linkages again.
    psssst - the LC8's have PDS shocks.

    This is all interesting reading. I would have though that my 950 S has too soft fork springs cause I've bottomed out the front more than once. Got wifey to help me check sag etc the other day and found that the both front and rear sag's are pretty damn close given my weight (using 15% 30% for Static Dynamic). Might have to try more compression damping for the front?

    I do know that the shock's rebound damping is excessive though - it has a tendency to pack down over corriguations - couple of clicks less makes a noticable +ve difference but I must try less damping. My biggest problem is the tendency to lock up the rear wheel under brakes. I'm guessing that less rebound damping would help with this as well but I'm not totally sure. Any advise on this?

    Cheers R
    "The ultimate result of shielding men from the effects of folly is to fill the world with fools." - Herbert Spencer, English Philosopher (1820-1903)

  11. #26
    Join Date
    15th August 2004 - 17:52
    Bike
    KTM 2T & LC4
    Location
    Rather be riding
    Posts
    3,326
    Quote Originally Posted by cooneyr View Post
    psssst - the LC8's have PDS shocks.
    Oops, fixed above.

    Quote Originally Posted by cooneyr View Post
    This is all interesting reading. I would have though that my 950 S has too soft fork springs cause I've bottomed out the front more than once. Got wifey to help me check sag etc the other day and found that the both front and rear sag's are pretty damn close given my weight (using 15% 30% for Static Dynamic). Might have to try more compression damping for the front?
    A few more clicks of compression damping, or add some oil. The other thing to remember is that you probably should bottom out the suspension sometimes - gently and controlled, that is - because if you aren't, you aren't using your suspension to its best.

    btw what numbers do KTM suggest in the book? You may find more specific values for your kit, esp if they use top-out springs, and the PDS. I know on the SX/XC KTMs the PDS is renowned for being very sensitive to preload (like KTM quote 15mm range not 30mm, and experienced tuners say only 3mm ).

    Quote Originally Posted by cooneyr View Post
    I do know that the shock's rebound damping is excessive though - it has a tendency to pack down over corriguations - couple of clicks less makes a noticable +ve difference but I must try less damping. My biggest problem is the tendency to lock up the rear wheel under brakes. I'm guessing that less rebound damping would help with this as well but I'm not totally sure. Any advise on this?
    Definitely back off the rebound damping ASAP!!! Dr Robert cites excessive rebound as a #1 cause of otherwise inexplicable crashes (road/track presumably). IIRC he says ppl tend to set the rebound a couple of clicks too hard - so set it to where you are happy, then back off a bit. It should feel a little too plush & loose not super firm.

    Locking up under brakes can mean the wheel isn't rebounding fast enough to stay on the ground. Or you just don't get along with sharp brakes - lower the pedal, and/or change sintered pads to organics, the latter having less bite more feel.

    Have a dig around on the net, there are lots of helpful articles about dialling in the suspension, what to change for various problems. I haven't seen the dual-sport one Nordie suggests, but want to.

    And unfortunately, with us living in the major compromise world of adventure where we face a massive variety of conditions, it may be impossible to get the suspension working optimally across all conditions. So like changing tyre pressures for seal/dirt, you may need to have suspension settings for seal/dirt. I do that for the 640A usually by riding from one to the other and noticing the suspension needs a tweak and click here or there improves things dramatically.
    Cheers,
    Colin

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve McQueen
    All racers I know aren't in it for the money. They race because it's something inside of them... They're not courting death. They're courting being alive.

  12. #27
    Join Date
    26th January 2008 - 07:37
    Bike
    91 R80GS
    Location
    Nelson
    Posts
    5,225
    You have to admit it is an interesting field for trial & error.

    I very rarely use my back brake as it locks up very very quickly. I'm wondering if playing around with rebound will change that.

  13. #28
    Join Date
    30th March 2007 - 18:18
    Bike
    KLR650 WR450
    Location
    Kapiti
    Posts
    2,665
    Quote Originally Posted by Padmei View Post
    You have to admit it is an interesting field for trial & error.

    I very rarely use my back brake as it locks up very very quickly. I'm wondering if playing around with rebound will change that.
    getting your iniminators working properly will help heaps with back brake lockups as it reduces weight transfer to the front when the forks blow through their stroke with chronic brake dive. (this assumes you use your front and rear at the same time)

  14. #29
    Join Date
    30th March 2007 - 18:18
    Bike
    KLR650 WR450
    Location
    Kapiti
    Posts
    2,665
    finally got around to measuring the settings properly...

    185mm total tavel
    big sag = 25mm = 13%
    rider & bike sag 75mm = 40%

    sounds like it needs a bit more preload? - but I'll ride it for a bit and see how it goes

  15. #30
    Join Date
    2nd March 2004 - 13:00
    Bike
    FransAlp 700
    Location
    Nelson
    Posts
    14,484
    Quote Originally Posted by marks View Post
    finally got around to measuring the settings properly...

    185mm total tavel
    big sag = 25mm = 13%
    rider & bike sag 75mm = 40%

    sounds like it needs a bit more preload? - but I'll ride it for a bit and see how it goes
    Sounds like the spring may be a bit strong solo but should be about perfect with a bit of gear on the back.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •