I used to have a JW15 peashooter. It would only group within a couple of MOA's and the bore wasn't even centrally located in the barrel. I tried to use one of those slip on moderators and blew the front off it with the first shot.
You get what you pay for - Asian shite which is substandard and unnecessarily cruel.
I gave it away to a mate (poor bastard) and replaced it with a Marlin 925. Using a rest I can put consecutive bullets through the same hole at 50 yards - more than two and a half times the rifle for two and a half times the price made it a good deal as far as I'm concerned.
start with:what are you planning to use it for,how often are you going to shoot it.I bought a Norico copy of a CZ75 in 2001 planning to shoot maybe once or twice a year and ended up shooting at least 200 rounds a month for the first 2yrs I had a private farmland to shoot in,after that aprox.every 3+_ months at different ranges and now I shoot once a month again nothing less that 200rnds a session,broke a firing pin 2yrs ago,turned one myself from EN9 and had it hardened,not bad for a "cheap copy",nothing wrong with a copy if you look after it.I also reload,shoot a few hot/carry loads to keep the feel otherwise lead cast medium loads.
not only the quality of copy that matters.....
the whole chinese copying concept goes against my grain..
but then again maybe not everybody has principles
Opinions are like arseholes: Everybody has got one, but that doesn't mean you got to air it in public all the time....
Dude we should make a date at the rifle range.
Mind you - even if it can't be proven that the Marlin is a far better rifle than the Norinco you've got (which I doubt), it certainly is better then the one I had - that variability in itself would be testiment to extremely poor quality control.
I will admit that my Norinco looks and feels cheap; the stock is rough and some on the metal on it looks like it was made by a drunken monkey. It looks shit. BUT, it shoots very well. It loves Winchester Super X Power Point ammo. It shoots consistently and extremely well for the price. It puts my mates Ruger 10/22 to shame- and that gun owes him over $700 (including scope). PM me if you would like to meet at the Handloaders club in Mcleans Island on a Tuesday night.
Hehe - you're on.
You can't compare a bolt action with a semi auto when it comes to accuracy, any 10/22 is quite likely to be at a disadvantage to any bolt action .22 - same goes for any calibre - right up until one needs to quickly unload a magazine at a rapidly disappearing (or approaching) target which otherwise might not have even been missed in the first place.
This will be the real test - check your PMs.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks