give it a go, a cast iron barrel is a cast iron barrel,
i dare say the piston and rings are probably sub standard, but if you keep all the original gear, if it goes tits up,
then well just stick all the original stuff back on
good luck
Okay,
Bugger it.... Hijack alert.......
More can be found HEREYou know that changing the exhaust pipes on your two-stroke motorcycle can have a marked effect on the engine's power characteristics, but do you know why?
Simply put, it's because the two-stroke exhaust system, commonly referred to as an 'expansion chamber' uses pressure waves emanating from the combustion chamber to effectively supercharge your cylinder.
In reality, expansion chambers are built to harness sound waves (created in the combustion process) to first suck the cylinder clean of spent gasses--and in the process, drawing fresh air/gas mixture (known as 'charge') into the chamber itself--and then stuff all the charge back into the cylinder, filling it to greater pressures than could be achieved by simply venting the exhaust port into the open atmosphere. This phenomenon was first discovered in the 1950s by Walter Kaaden, who was working at the East German company MZ. Kaaden understood that there was power in the sound waves coming from the exhaust system, and opened up a whole new field in two-stroke theory and tuning.
Yeah, that's basically wrong (the metaphor), but I suspected that you'd run across something like that.
Even if it weren't, it has no relevancy to DB's post in any case.
The thing is quickbuck, that a "supercharging effect" does not constitute "supercharging" (anymore than a "forced air" air box does)
There is a lot of rubbish written on the internet about 2 strokes (and like many things, the same rubbish gets repeated time after time), just by different people.
I assure you that an expansion chamber does not "supercharge" a cylinder (super charging "effect" not withstanding)
I am of the opinion that the first person to write of the "supercharging EFFECT" (in English literature) was AG Bell, when he reffered to this "super charging effect", and many people (mistakingly) took this to read that a two stroke with an expansion chamber was "super charged".
The fact is, that it isn't.
I am not alone in thinking this.
The FIM certainly don't think a 2 stroke is supercharged...... they banned supercharging quite some time ago.
An expansion chamber is a busy piece of kit, and indeed we can use the resonance to do many things that assist evacuation of the crankcase ( crankcase scavenging), as well as plugging the exhaust port, after pushing back (some) of the over scavenged charge,(which is part of the cylinder scavenging phase) and in the case of a reed valve inlet, hold the top reed open to operate the inlet boost port. (Using the negative vacum created in the header after the returning pulse wave)
Among other things.
I don't need one, why don't we just stick with the facts, they're out there if you choose to look for them.
No, there is only one reason. But back to your original post, there is no compressor in an expansion chamger, and thus no 'charger' of any sort. Utilising pressure waves in an expansion chamber is not supercharging, turbo charging, or any other form of charging. The guys metaphor is crap, he would have been better to just stick with the facts.
Although it's an irrelevant straw man, turbocharging is a sub category of supercharging, but nobody refers to them as such as it strips the clarity that the two seperate terms give.
Naturally aspirated: the pressure on the intake side of the engine is, roughly, equal to atmospheric pressure. I put in roughly since a slight overpressure may be present due to clever intake designs and such.
Forced induction (turbos and superchargers): the pressure on the intake side of the engine is significantly higher than atmospheric pressure due to a compressor - driven either mechanically or by the exhaust gasses.
On two-stroke engines it becomes a bit muddy compared to four-strokes, since the air/fuel mixture is effectively being "forced" into the combustion chamber by the piston's downward stroke - i.e. it isn't only being sucked into the cylinder.
However, unless there is a compressor compacting the mixture the overall gas density will be equivalent to atmospheric pressure. This has to be the case since the piston displaces an equal volume inside the cylinder irrespective of direction of travel.
Oh, and a GN250 isn't a sportbike...
It is preferential to refrain from the utilisation of grandiose verbiage in the circumstance that your intellectualisation can be expressed using comparatively simplistic lexicological entities. (...such as the word fuck.)
Remember your humanity, and forget the rest. - Joseph Rotblat
Want to muddy it even further... so called 'chemical supercharging' ala NOS... no compressor again, but more oxygen added that can be obtained from atmospheric pressure alone.
Yes, but I wouldn't ever call it supercharging. After all, the pressure remains roughly at atmosphere. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nitrous...bustion_engine
It would be just as valid to consider adding stuff to the fuel supercharging. I.e. not at all, IMO.
It is preferential to refrain from the utilisation of grandiose verbiage in the circumstance that your intellectualisation can be expressed using comparatively simplistic lexicological entities. (...such as the word fuck.)
Remember your humanity, and forget the rest. - Joseph Rotblat
Agreed, same end result != same thing.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks