As has been touched upon, the radar lock doesn't clear itself. He could have left the 74 km/h sitting there since the last time he pulled someone over and then just gone for you... But why would he? What would be the motice? Surely it would be easy enough to catch someone speeding for real.
It does sound rather suspect! No matter what happened, his conduct is unbecoming of an officer and I hope your complaint doesn't just fall on deaf ears. Maybe you should send your letter to the IPCA as well.
P-dealers, dishonest politicians and corrupt cops - scum of the earth!

Originally Posted by
red mermaid
Overseas studies have shown they result in a decrease in the number of complaints because in the majority of cases back up what the officer says.
I've no doubt that there are plenty of unscrupulous characters out there willing to twist and lie to try and get off a ticket by misrepresenting the conduct of the officer. In my quiet mind I also believe that there are more of such characters than there are bad cops.
However, a cop would be very stupid indeed to behave inappropriately when he is on camera. And that's reason enough for having them - but it's a two-way deal really, it's to protect both the citizen and the officer.

Originally Posted by
JMemonic
I was about to suggest this as an option, surely it would be legal to do so and use in evidence.
I am not entirely sure. The key thing is to have it accepted as evidence in a court of law. Even if rejected as evidence the recording could still be of some interest to let's say the police... or the press.

Originally Posted by
Daffyd
I'm not sure, but I believe it's illegal to record a conversation without the permission of the other party.
You do not need permission from the other party.

Originally Posted by
no_8wire
IIRC it is illegal to record a converstation without the other persons knowlegde...eg if you are talking to them on a phone and are recording it at your end etc...So if you tell them you are recording it and they dont like it to bad for them...you keep on recording
I am pretty sure this is correct - if you want any chance of it being used as evidence. Otherwise you need a warrant of some sort to conduct clandestine surveillance and have the recordings accepted as evidence.
You can record anything you want though. It's not illegal to record or document anything that takes place in a public place. Unless there is a breach of privacy involved (spying through windows, planting listening devices in people's homes, etc.) you wouldn't be doing anything illegal. Otherwise, most tourists snapping a photo or video of Kawarau bridge would be breaking the law...
It only becomes complicated once it's to be accepted as evidence.
It is preferential to refrain from the utilisation of grandiose verbiage in the circumstance that your intellectualisation can be expressed using comparatively simplistic lexicological entities. (...such as the word fuck.)
Remember your humanity, and forget the rest. - Joseph Rotblat
Bookmarks