http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/ar...ectid=10643568
C'mon KB... where is the knee jerk reaction we're so famous for?![]()
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/ar...ectid=10643568
C'mon KB... where is the knee jerk reaction we're so famous for?![]()
KiwiBitcher
where opinion holds more weight than fact.
It's better to not pass and know that you could have than to pass and find out that you can't. Wait for the straight.
Where's the need for one?
Originally Posted by Mully
I am sure the dog handler would be feeling sick over the incident and will be filling in paperwork for a while yet.
Hope the child heals quickly and fully.
I'd assume that its one rule for all right?
So the dog gets put down.
After all, You can't go around mauling kids faces no matter how hairy you are.
Given the kid got unwanted unjustified attention from the Police, the kid must ride a motor bike.
Surely.
I think it's great that the family are'nt wanting the dog put down or "fired", and realise that it's a very very rare once off. Cudos to them for that.
Mauling is a bit of a 3 news description is'nt it?! He bit the kid, if he'd mauled him there'd be no face left.
Putting it down I think is completely knee-jerk and unnecessary. I actually do'nt think it'll do it again, after the hiding the handler would have given it! Dogs do learn, I reckon it most likely is a once off. I mean shit, we keep violent murderers/rapists etc alive, and I hold the dog told in far higher stead than them. If we put all of the rapists and murderers down first, then maybe we can look at the dog. After all you said it, one rule for all. (bear in mind I think of crims as less than equals to a dog)
Cats land on their feet. Toast lands jamside down.
A cat glued to some jam toast will hover in quantum indecision
Curiosity was framed; ignorance killed the cat
Fix a computer and it'll break tomorrow.
Teach its owner to fix it and it'll break in some way you've never seen before.
We have no idea what would have happened to the child if the handler wasn't holding onto the dog, The potential for far more serious injury was only a hair away.
If I owned a dog and it done that to a policemans face it would be destroyed before anyone could claim it was a one off event and I'd be getting the beating. Not that any such claims would make any difference even if time was given to voice them.
If the police paraded that dog in front of my children there would be hell to pay.
That aside, We had a dog that done that to a childs face, It was horrible to witness and completely out of character.
A year or so later it tired to do it again though it was stopped before it could pierce the skin. We had him put down . A sad day for an old friend but it should have been done after the first incident.
It's a dog, not a robot... given that the training is given to it by men, then it's bound to have failures.
People stab them, and hit them with iron bars, it's imperative that they're a little savage, getting them close to school children is crazy.
Did the kid grabbed the dog's genitals?
If you can make it on Kiwibiker you can make it anywhere.
A dog that is trained to be savage and vicious when the need arises... all of a sudden something touches him from a direction he's not expecting attention from, he gets startled and boom he defends himself as he's been trained to do. Not the dogs fault.
First thing I ever learnt about animal safety was not to approach any potentially dangerous animal from anywhere where it can't see you - this kid learnt the hard way.
Good thing it wasn't a motorcyclists getting his face bit or we'd already be 20 pages deep in "kill the fucking dog" posts
KiwiBitcher
where opinion holds more weight than fact.
It's better to not pass and know that you could have than to pass and find out that you can't. Wait for the straight.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks