
Originally Posted by
rie
it isn't an argument that "short people need small bikes" or not. i haven't read Lula's column yet but it seems that the key factor that arises from short-people-on-bikes discussions is the value of information: that any person falling outside manufacturers' norms will benefit from specialised information from those with similar experiences. for instance, i have discovered that general advice regarding tyre pressures and suspension is inapplicable to me because i weigh 45kg, so i like to speak with those who know about suspension for light riders. i also enjoy connecting with shorter riders on tips that have helped them on gravel, etc. yet this does not affect my justification for buying my bike, which some have criticised as being "too big." if i tip-toe, i need information arising from dialogue and experience. if i only have one arm, the same would apply.
would people say to a one armed person that "you might want to ride but forget that dream because you probably need a disability car"? no, because it's none of their business. suddenly the argument that a light person "might want to get a gsxr but she'd probably need a [gn/scooter/etc]" has little salience.
postscript: i apologise for comparing a missing limb with shortness; they are not comparable but it was an illustrative example
5ft 3 and 45 kg! blimey. I am 5 ft4 and 70. EVERY Bike I have ever had has been "too big".
Some I physically have difficulty with (trail bikes: the seats are at nipple height...... oooh errr my nipples I mean). but anything else not so much. I'm used to it now. and once its moving, generally not an issue.
I thought elections were decided by angry posts on social media. - F5 Dave
Bookmarks