Ah thanks for the result Pete. Obviosly I haven't seen that race, it may have been a great one. I don't think however anyone is hating as such on MotoGP, it'sstill the number 1 class with some riveting action. But comparing numbers with numbers, 18 (maximum) bikes vs 42? It's simple. If the MotoGP class was better subscribed then there would be no discussion.
And yes thanks for the result again.
[edit] I've now added a warning to this thread.
That's what I have against them. Whilst the racing is often really good...they're slower than the 250's they replace...and they don't burn oil like the smokers they replace! But...like the four strokes in Moto-GP...I'm sure I'll eventually admit defeat and get into them 100%. Times...they are a changin.
Hmm, I must have missed the anti-moto2 hype. Been looking forward to this series since the announced it and it has really delivered. 40+ bikes on the grid and apart from Mugello, the winner has always come down to the final lap! Doesn't get better than that.
As for laptimes - you're right, they're slower. At the tracks that GP and WSS have shared so far both the old 250s and Laverty's CBR have been ~2 secs a lap quicker!
#24 1989 Honda NC30
The Moto Gp race was a cracker as well i must admit! Although not for the lead.... Maybe it was the new track that closed everyone up
moto2 is great watching I only wish at least one team ran a 2T just because they still could! free season win and a good comparison for why the smokers where still world champ bikes!
2strokers! because four strokes is playing with it
Don't do it Crasher it's an evil Dorna plot to bring back a dull as dishwater European race style to crush the tail sliding rev happy American/Commonwealth domination,pioneered by King Kenny and honed to a killer edge by Mighty Mick.
I will never go over to the dark side.
Two strokes,work of the devil I say.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks