Well done Anne, you couldn't get me to appear on TV for love or money - but whilst I sympathise with MAG-NZ and the reasons why it was setup, I'm still going to have my say on this matter.
Based solely on that TV appearance MAGs primary greivance is that MSL is discriminatry, but you know what, Joe Public only remembers that car drivers subsidise bikes by $70 a year already, do you think they care that we are paying $28 a year toward a ring fenced fund for our exclusive benefit? And do you think they care whether the original $70 claims were true and accurate?
The other arguement was that the funding was already available despite the MSL being introduced. If the funding channels are already there through ACC rather than the specific MSL - MAG_NZ would be better advised to push to see that ACC matches the MSL $ for $ instead of unrealistic calls for abolishing it. If they were successful at doing this surely $4m-$5.5m could go a long way towards reducing our accident rates.
And as for the arguement about the extra financial burden, $28 doesn't even cover 1 tank of gas these days.
Bookmarks