
Originally Posted by
Winston001
The problem with our argument here is that we are all decent average people. None of us harm or are violent to our children. Some of us occasionally use a short smack to make a point with a child. We consider that to be normal effective discipline and it works.
We are not the people the law, CYPS, or the police are concerned about. There are the others, the small percentage of our population who are violent and abusive with their children. We have all seen the media reports.
Section 59 used to provide a reasonable doubt even for some abusive parents. The public blamed judges, juries and lawyers - but the simple fact was the law was loose.
So - Section 59 was amended and tightened up. Abusive parents will find it hard to find a defence, and it's notable that in the last 3 years there haven't been any Not Guilty verdicts in violent cases.
There is no slew of cases where decent parents have been victimised by the police or CYPS. In a nation of 4 million, you'd expect hundreds of prosecutions annually against ordinary parents if the law required that.
It doesn't.
Absolutely! You have hit the nail on the head, but sadly I doubt many here have the wit to read and listen to what you have said.
Don't blame me, I voted Green.
Bookmarks