WTF... gotta feel for the boss
WTF... gotta feel for the boss
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
so the thief gets a soggy bus ticket punishment, and the guy trying to provide real punishment (and a very restrained sort too) loses his house.![]()
"A shark on whiskey is mighty risky, but a shark on beer is a beer engineer" - Tad Ghostal
Bring back the Town Hall stocks!
Shame the fuckers!
TOP QUOTE: “The problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other people’s money.”
The old saying " the law is an ass" rings true in this case, unfortunately this is more common than people realise.
Employee theft has sent a number of good small business' to the wall in my experience.
Very common in the UK, case law is littered with these kinds of issues where the perpetrator (scumbag) gets away scot free whilst the victim (innocent) gets royally shafted.
Defending and protecting what's yours has become more of a criminal act than the criminal act.
Oh bugger
I'm assuming he did as he had 30,000 pounds of legal fees and had to pay 5k compensation... 30k legal fees, fackin hell, and the advice, settle out of court... I understand people are stubborn, but the legal profession really don't give a shit as long as they have billable hours.
that says it all really.Originally Posted by martybabe
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
I thought that was the legal fees for settling out of court, crap knows what they would have been if he had have gone to court cause then you have the barrister as well as the solicitor to pay. If he had won he might have possibly got an order on the thief to pay his legal fees but would have still ended up homeless as you can bet the tealeaf would not pay.
Quote Originally Posted by martybabe
Defending and protecting what's yours has become more of a criminal act than the criminal act.
heh, not sure, it just struck me as an obscene amount of money to have to pay for not going to court... and if that's what it costs to not go to court, like you say, I'm not surprised he settled... true, the tealeaf wouldn't pay... he'd have been better off going hard out and copping an assault charge...
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
Now you have me thinking. This is really ridiculous. By the time you take the pressure on the family etc from losing the home he could have topped the bastard, lived off the state for 10 or so years in one of their holiday camps and then started again, probably with state assistance.
i don't recommend or condone the above from me but it is getting to that stage.![]()
, you got me to wondering so it's all your fault
![]()
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
hold on!!
He said his fees where $4000 for defending the case and their fees are $25,000 prosecuting him!
Fark off he's gettin ripped! Their legal fees should be similar to his surely? Tell them to go jump!
Thats aside from the injustice of the whole thing in the first place!!
On a Motorcycle you're penetrating distance, right along with the machine!! In a car you're just a spectator, the windshields like a TV!!
'Life's Journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out! Shouting, ' Holy sh!t... What a Ride!! '
Indeed. I suppose as an alternative one could either choose to use the due process, (whether one agrees with it or not) or make an arrangement with alleged thief to publicly humiliate instead of taking him to the local constabulary, thus keeping a clean record, but not both.
5000 in compensation.
4000 in his own legal costs.
The balance was entirely for the thief's legal costs...
Who'd he get legal advice from? The thief's lawyer?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks