Last edited by Virago; 11th April 2011 at 08:08. Reason: HTM f'ing L
I fear the day technology will surpass our human interaction. The world will have a generation of idiots! ALBERT EINSTEIN
that is a shame, because i think this will cause a revenue drop as trail rides will find private insurance at much better rates elsewhere.
this whole thread was ment to be a fact finding mission to help people who were undecided who to vote for, but it typical Kiwibiker style it has ended in a name calling shit fight, with very little of the input coming from Jim or Chris,
as for why my old man pulled his sponsorship of all MNZ events, you will have to ask him, because we do not speak for each other, and i feel i have done enough around motorcycling to deserve my own voice, as does he,
Very few people have put as much of their own money into motorcycle racing over the last 20 years in NZ as he has, through sponsoring riders, series and events, we all know he is not shy in telling people what he thinks, but i think it at least needs to be looked at why he pulled his sponsorship, and Ian, ill tell you the main reason was not money.
The main reason's why i think the board is off track is with the trail ride levy as mentioned above, but also about what this article is about. http://www.moto-media.net/?id=721
as it states in that article at the bottom is the fact that i am taking some time away from running motorcycle events and even my business to do a long overdue OE, so it may not effect me so much who wins this election, but I have been going to races since i was born, and have a huge passion for motorcycle racing of all types, i had a few more questions to ask, but this has been a shit fight enough on here,
You wudda missed a winter meet at Manfield, still not very patriotic of you!!
Im taking the piss Shaun, because after all, who gives a shit if Chris was asked to see if any Kiwis that wernt going to be otherwise engaged wanted to go to an out of country meeting.
At least he wasnt being obstructive & destructive to the racing fraternity.
It can hardly be used as a stick to hit him with.
Good thoughts Scott, I especially liked this quote from the article you linked to:
"This is the sort of patronising language one would expect from a School Principal addressing a class of third formers, not an elected national body writing to a group of mature club committee members."
I have witnessed such attitudes recently at this years rounds of the Nationals. It always seems to need to be an "us vs them" mentality which is never going to move our sport forward.
I wasn't going to respond , but I have too I'm sorry. I have had experiences that may have cloud my judgement about the reason Kawasaki didn't front, but I have seen it before , way before you were even out of school mate , so don't patronise me , I doubt that anyone has put as much in to the sport as what I have done since 1971. And Scott it cost me personally big time $$$$$$$ in the end.
Ian, by no means was that a shot at you, i remember being at school and coming with Dad to by tyres off you, and you would be part of the very few in that group as well, and your continued commitment to the road race champs is awesome, live updates is very cool, wish someone would do it for the mx nats as well,
Last edited by scott411; 11th April 2011 at 12:45. Reason: adding to it
Mate no worries , your dad and I go way back and yes we haven't always seen eye to eye and may never do again. But that doesn't mean I don't respect him as a businessman and motorcycle person. I hope he keeps supporting the Red Devil Race Team or what ever he chooses.
Back to work , over and out
Ian
see scrivy ,its very hard to take what you say seriously when you come out with statements like the above.for this to have happened in the way you suggest implies the rest of the board let it happen, were in fact compliant in letting it happen, but nowhere on this thread have i seen you take any of them to task over it,
it implies that they are all 4 of them weak willed and obviously in such a state as to be unable to protest , or raise concerns, yet no one has challenged either of the 2 board members up for re-election implying i think satisfaction in their performance.
love the we wernt going to be bullied !! really isnt that what you do so well. in an earlier post you said id obviously been told the wrong information, perhaps theres a few conversations over the past few years you have obviously forgotten
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks