Would love to see them go 10 sec a lap slower and have no traction control etc, then the men would shine from the boys.
Lorenzo's highside kinda showed how much they rely on the electrickery, very fast on the throttle = off the bike if ya are used to having the pc do the job for ya.
Bring back skids and smokeF1 have learned the hard way by loosing huge followings...........look how popular it is again without all the aids.
That would be interesting, has Casey ever ridden a GP without TC. I remember a few years ago they had Vale following Casey at PI and had the throttle break graphics showing, Casey just hit the apex and was 100% throttle, Vale was more what you'd expect feeding it steadily till just after the apex.
Was definately a huge difference in throttle application between the 2, Casey so obviously relying more on his TC than Vale.
Still sounds like someone making a lot of excuses for a carbon chassis that seemed to perform quite well in the last 6 races of the season last year. (4 podiums including 3 wins). As far as money, I think Stoner is getting paid way more with Honda than he got at Ducati. Remember when he was sitting out a few races and Ducati offered silly money to Lorenzo? That pretty well made up Stoners mind that he wasnt really valued at Ducati. I'm sure Honda were keen to pay top dollar to get a rider as good as Stoner. Looking at the results, looks like money well spent.
Try a 250 GP bike. Stoner is also a multiple time Australian dirt track champion. One of the many reasons he has such fantastic throttle control. If you look back at interviews when Stoner was Haydens team mate, Hayden always said Stoner's throttle control was incredible when their data was compared. It was actually Hayden that was just cracking it open, not Stoner. Stoner is also one of the more vocal guys speaking out against TC.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks