OK - I assumed this was because the bike was being stored - if you intend riding it around - just pay the tax or it will bite you on the arse.
OK - I assumed this was because the bike was being stored - if you intend riding it around - just pay the tax or it will bite you on the arse.
Legally, there shouldn't be any issue with getting insurance paid out on a bike with the rego on hold. As for people saying you shouldn't be riding without rego, I rode to wellington to protest the rego hikes, and as that was a complete failure I am now in the second phase of protest, refusing to pay unjust ACC levies. If I get pulled over I guess I will have to pay the fine, but with multiple bikes I would have to be pulled over and fined $200 every month for a year before it would be more expensive than paying rego. I ride everyday, and it has been years since I was last pulled over, so I am not overly concerned.
Nope wrong, that's the classic kiwi-take it in the bum hole attitude. Fuck paying it and stand up, they're raping us. Been doing it for over a year now (car and bike) and I'm up in the pocket a good few hundy with no fines to speak of- touch wood!
Rego has no effect on insurance, it's just a tax. It's wof that matters.
...Full throttle till you see god, then brake.
Sadly the fuckers are giving demerit points out now for no regio....fuckers...
The Vero assessor who looked my bike over for quake damage said to me no problem with the claim,I check with the repairer and he has refused to paint the half of tank that had a scratch on it and the grab rail which lost the paint when it slid down the side of the car.......costing me 500 on top of excess to have it all painted........gutted after years of full insurance on two bikes with no claims...so binning vero when I pick it up monday........
sorry it was the assessor who would not have the tank and grab rail painted.....not the repairer........
Sorry to read your tale. I've had good experiences with Vero, better than any of the other times I've had to claim for anything.
I was using them through the Honda/Golightly scheme and they were brilliant.
The bike shop was most impressed too. When the VFR was repaired following a nose dive into a ditch, Vero phoned the shop to check that the customer was happy.
The dealer was not used to getting calls like that from insurance companies...
There is a grey blur, and a green blur. I try to stay on the grey one. - Joey Dunlop
The bird fell on one side,I pick it up this week,right hand side damage,mirrors,indicator,side panel,......two other bird with same damage as mine......I ll send an e mail to vero/golightly expressing my displeasure but as they are a money making business I don,t expect much sympathy.... I ll go third party from now on and save some money....![]()
Not quite right... it's primarily whether it has a fault that a reasonable person could be expected to know about that was also a contributing factor to the reason for the damage. Having a WoF won't save you if you have bald tyres. Just as not having a WoF won't exclude a claim on that basis alone.
If it wasn't for a concise set of rules, we might have to resort to common sense!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks