I found Stoners take on the carbon/steel/alloy thing interesting...
http://www.superbikeplanet.com/2011/Aug/110830cs27.htm
I found Stoners take on the carbon/steel/alloy thing interesting...
http://www.superbikeplanet.com/2011/Aug/110830cs27.htm
Only my own eyes Jelly,cos I would never trust what some Dorna payed hack writes.
But how about from the horses mouth...check what Dovi has to say on the matter in Rachprice's post
http://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/sh...a-coming/page7
Sure, but until a couple of years ago, 250s was the next rung down from MotoGP in the development ladder. Now it's Moto2, and we'll see how they go. Barring the odd exception (Elias) they're doing fine. Though, since Elias is the only one to try the switch so far, I'm working on a selected sample of 0.
And how come Elias's difficulties this year are a result of his year in Moto2? He's raced 250 and MotoGP for years. One year in Moto2 has turned him into a donkey? Yeah right.
I haven't forgotten that Superbike riders haven't gone well in MotoGP. Not relevant to Moto2 vs 250 though. Well OK, you could argue Moto2 is more like Superbikes, but in my experience you can argue pretty much anything, Crashy. And with such apparent sincerity.
What has fucked Elias? Don't know. He won a race in 2006, but he never did that well on the 800s, just threw in a few promising races at contract renegotiation time. I get the impression he's the sort of rider who has to have everything going right for him to do well. Some discouraging results, he gets offside with the crew and he goes into a downwards spiral, like Melandri in 2008.
Of course you can argue anything...no good if everyone agrees on everything! I'm only too happy we've all got our own opinions. People without them are generally boring fucks.
And Elias...you're right. He only won one race on a 990. And as good as that race was...he's done fuck all since. But I can't recall him being so off the pace as he is now. And I think Melandri lost the plot after trying to ride the Ducati at the back of the field for a year. He didn't get on the 800cc Honda after becoming a world champ in the year before.
I'm curious: what's the difference in approach to riding a MotoGP bike between riders coming from 250GP and WSBK? (Sounds like the start of a joke, doesn't it?) Is it that the 250GPs require maintaining/can maintain high corner speed, while WSBK bikes can/do rely more on the "point-and-squirt" technique (and the former technique translates better over to MotoGP than the latter)?
Whilst I've never raced a Superbike, I've certainly tried to race a 250GP bike. I think Dovi said it best. Superbikes are also a lot softer and more forgiving to ride than GP bikes so they say. I can tell you that after racing a KR1SP reasonably successfully that a 250GP bike is NOTHING like a 250 Proddie bike to ride/race. The only thing they had in common was being two strokes, and learning to trust/ride the front tyre 100%.
Ta.Different bikes, different techniques... Oh, that's just gonna open a whole can-o'-worms about how Stoner is able to ride a bike how it needs to be ridden and Rossi isn't willing to.
![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks