
Originally Posted by
tigertim20
does anyone have the figures to compare how 4 out of 600 compares to the amount caught out of every 600 tested in say auckland or dunedin or anywhere else in a routine booze-bus stop? just wonder if thats any higher than the average?
3 out of 2200 tested at march hare

Originally Posted by
scumdog
OK< not going into the pros and cons of the March Hare story but one thing I will say:
IF they had tested everybody who wanted to be tested before they left the rally a fair number would probably be over.
If the test device showed a positive reading it would then 'purge' in that it takes a minute or two to clear that alcohol from its system before it is ready for the next test.

Originally Posted by
tigertim20
I understand where you are coming from in terms of the device needing time between positive readings, BUT, If the cops in that instance were there because they wanted to make sure people were safe, then they would have produced many more machines, so that people could be tested to check.
apart from what scummy said, I went out & tried to get tested (march hare) & they said no & I tried a few different points....
while I was waiting got to talking with plod, & it had happened at another rally some where, that they tested some one before they left & the rider found that he was ok, so the
goes back in starts drinking then goes out & gets done DIC it goes to court & he gets off coz the
said he was ok the 1st time, egg all over police face, so now they tell us you not sure eat some thing have another coffee "BUT DON"T RIDE" until your sure or know
Greater love has no one than this, than to lay down one’s life for his friends. (John 15:13)
Bookmarks