I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
Would an interest rate rise affecting floating rate mortgages automatically increase our levels of private debt? In that the mortgage rate goes up by x% and therefore my debt rises by $x once recalculated.
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
Good question. Don't know. I've always assumed total debt was calculated on the nett sums owing. Its certainly possible to calculate a forward value of debt including annual interest in which case it would grow.
The importance of say 0.5% interest rise is sovereign (government) and private debt costs more each year to service. Thus outsiders looking at NZ conclude we can't spend/invest as much because of the extra interest burden. Our internal economy shrinks.
It wouldn't really make sense to increase interest rates after being downgraded then? not that interest rates will rise, but I guess it would follow that if we have to borrow money at a higher rate, due to our downgraded credit rating, then something has to rise to cover the extra costs incurred? is there a "traditional" response to being downgraded?
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
Certainly, interest rates rise both internally and externally for NZ. That is because lenders (Dutch dentists, Saudi investment funds, Chinese banks) reckon we are more risky and require higher interest if we want their money.
Consequently lenders within NZ need more interest to cover what they borrow from overseas. Your mortgage rate rises. The NZ government has to follow this by offering to pay higher interest on government bonds. If they didn't, they wouldn't be able to borrow money.
It gets worse. Our currency drops with the credit rating (down at least 5% at the moment) which means our exports bring in more money. But as soon as we start offering a higher rate of interest (government, banks, councils), the currency jumps up. Wiping out export gains.
She's a hard road to tune an economy.
Exactly.
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
Interesting post. Leads me to wonder if there actually is any way to 'tune' an economy. Seems to be for every positive action there is a negative compensation and vice versa.
Starting to wonder if the whole thing is meant be remain in a constant state of flux simply as a means to generating winners and losers.
....and the beat goes on!!
"There must be a one-to-one correspondence between left and right parentheses, with each left parenthesis to the left of its corresponding right parenthesis."
Exactly. The problem is that we are used to government spending and cuts are unpopular. Private spending on McMansions and pure consumption using borrowed money fuels our balance of payments deficit.
What frustrates me is that we do not have a national conversation on these issues.
Every finance minister in the world would agree.As for being in flux, very true. But so are our daily lives, nothing is certain, illness strikes, accidents happen, redundancies etcetera.
One way to remove some uncertainty is a fixed exchange rate. TBH I don't understand how its done - or can be done by small countries. China is one place with a fixed rate.
it's be nice if they could carry a tune to go with itOriginally Posted by Clockwork
Wonder how many mortgage defaults are on the way, especially if the double dip recession hits, or triple dip, as English already said that we'd had a double dip some months ago...
like we'll ever find that out and get a chance to make those decisions... Lifetime perks for pollies would be the first on the blockOriginally Posted by BoristheBiter
![]()
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks