Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 39

Thread: 91 vs 95 octane?

  1. #16
    Join Date
    25th September 2011 - 10:52
    Bike
    Windle, MoBuilt, Fireblade, RS250, FZR4
    Location
    Dunedin
    Posts
    2,987
    Quote Originally Posted by Pornstar View Post
    Why the duece do we get all these road bikers givin there 2 cents on this page?
    haha.. cause an internal combustion engine is an internal combustion engine.. doesn't matter if its a 450cc single banger in a dirt frame or a 4 pot in a road frame

  2. #17
    Join Date
    8th July 2005 - 02:55
    Bike
    Several
    Location
    AKL
    Posts
    790
    You should use the fuel rating your engine is designed for...using a higher octane wont make a bit of difference. If the engine is designed for 91, it will make no difference using 95 because the engine will not produce the compression that may cause detonation that 95 octane will prevent. (did I say that right ?) 95 is meant for higher compression engines.

    There is one exception I agree with... if you are running at a trackday say, you really dont want detonation happening at high engine revs and if you got a dodgy batch of fuel (it happens) then you best mitigate that situation by using 95.... but you wont get anymore power from it.

  3. #18
    Join Date
    28th May 2009 - 20:00
    Bike
    2003 Honda CRF450R
    Location
    Palmerston North
    Posts
    267
    98 - from gull only. there is way too much variability in nz octane ratings - i'e heard of some "91"s being as low as 85 - 87 in tests. at least if you run 98 you have a chance of getting a semi decent octane. and as bp and gull are the only ones with 98, and bp charges like 5c more per litre, go to gull. Also, its not like its race fuel - 98 aint going to blow anything up, it just burns way cleaner and better combustion = more power. simple.

  4. #19
    Join Date
    9th May 2008 - 21:23
    Bike
    A
    Location
    B
    Posts
    2,547
    91 is fine for the lawnmower....

    Car and bike can run on 91, but I find that I get more kms per tank if I run on 95 or 98 (where available). Over the years, tested it various different ways and for me the highest grade of fuel gives the lowest running cost, ie cents/km. The bike feels more lively on 98, good enough for me to use it where I can.

  5. #20
    Join Date
    28th November 2007 - 13:41
    Bike
    2008 CRF450, CBR900RR, 125 Pit bike
    Location
    Hamilton
    Posts
    733
    All i can say is use the same fuel each time that way you know what your bike should perform like when you get to a ride. I always use BP 98 in every thing, ill go out of my way to get it. A friend of mine stopped by Mobil and brought 98 because he had no time to stop by BP, his bike wouldn't even run on it! We drained the carb and the tank put my BP 98 in and it started right up. I am sure my Van gets more Kms on 98, it can't retard the timing enough to run properly on 91.

  6. #21
    Join Date
    2nd March 2004 - 13:00
    Bike
    FransAlp 700
    Location
    Nelson
    Posts
    14,484
    My VT250 and Nordwest preferred 95 but the XR250, DR650 and TT350 prefer 91 for a noticeable bottom end improvement.

    The VT and Nordie were much higher compression than the others.

  7. #22
    Join Date
    16th January 2006 - 16:17
    Bike
    2013 Multistrada
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    1,429
    Just a little note, the octane rating is not, does not, and never will relate to the power a particular fuel will generate, it is a measure of how it burns in a controlled environment. 98 RON will deliver no more power in a vehicle designed and tuned for 91 than 91 will, if you want to spend the money dyno your vehicle same day same conditions just change the fuel and see if you get a increase in output.

    RON in a measurement determined to a scientific scale, 91 RON in NZ is 91 RON in the US blah blah.

    Further reading

    Oh as a side note F1 cars are limited to pump gas at 91 octane, this is tested by the governing body.
    Its not the destination that is important its the journey.

  8. #23
    Join Date
    9th January 2006 - 12:26
    Bike
    KX450 Motard/Flat Track KTM150SX H2R
    Location
    Tauranga
    Posts
    4,445
    in any late model 4 stroke mx bike i would run minimum 95 octane,

  9. #24
    Join Date
    10th May 2009 - 15:22
    Bike
    2010 Honda CB1000R Predator
    Location
    Orewa, Auckland
    Posts
    4,490
    Blog Entries
    19

    Quote Originally Posted by Adriaan View Post
    Does anyone have a preference and why ? Are there any pro's or con's to either ?

    Thanks
    I'm price sensitive, so I use 91.

  10. #25
    Join Date
    11th January 2010 - 04:48
    Bike
    KTM 350 SX-F
    Location
    Jafa Land
    Posts
    1,134
    Quote Originally Posted by JMemonic View Post
    RON in a measurement determined to a scientific scale, 91 RON in NZ is 91 RON in the US blah blah.
    Except that if you go to the US, you will see an octane number on the pump, as you do here and it will not be the same as you see here, because they list the PON, not the RON as we do. But if you'd read any of the previous posts...

  11. #26
    Join Date
    16th January 2006 - 16:17
    Bike
    2013 Multistrada
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    1,429
    Quote Originally Posted by Jay GTI View Post
    Except that if you go to the US, you will see an octane number on the pump, as you do here and it will not be the same as you see here, because they list the PON, not the RON as we do. But if you'd read any of the previous posts...
    I did, if you re-read my post I was not talking about what they display on the pumps, I stated that RON or research octane number is gained by a scientific test and thus will be the same no matter the country
    Its not the destination that is important its the journey.

  12. #27
    Join Date
    20th September 2009 - 14:02
    Bike
    A big Wheel, and a sponge bob scooter :P
    Location
    ...usually unsure
    Posts
    1,555
    Got PhatGirl tuned up to run on the cheap petrol ...mind you....Being a two valve guzzi, she would probably run on potatoe juice

    Cost was my driving factor...not performance (As long as no damage to the engine occurs)

    When Life thows me a curve
    ...I lean into it!

  13. #28
    Join Date
    11th January 2010 - 04:48
    Bike
    KTM 350 SX-F
    Location
    Jafa Land
    Posts
    1,134
    Quote Originally Posted by JMemonic View Post
    I did, if you re-read my post I was not talking about what they display on the pumps, I stated that RON or research octane number is gained by a scientific test and thus will be the same no matter the country
    Which, by and large, had already been covered.

  14. #29
    Join Date
    4th December 2006 - 19:19
    Bike
    Gilera 180 , ,GB400/650 ,SV650
    Location
    supercity thats the one
    Posts
    259
    much better quailty 98 has had a much better refinery process
    91 will go off quicker if left in a tank compared to 98 has happen to me

  15. #30
    Join Date
    25th October 2002 - 17:30
    Bike
    GSXR1000
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    9,291
    Quote Originally Posted by p.dath View Post



    I'm price sensitive, so I use 91.
    Ever worked out how far a tank of 91 gets you compared to 95? You may find you get more km's per tank from 95 (note may) therefore giving you better bang for your buck.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •