this guyOriginally Posted by Madness
. .
KB's Chief Cats
this guy
. .
Loud and Uncouth
??!
Winding up drongos, foil hat wearers and over sensitive KBers for over 14,000 posts...........
" Life is not a rehearsal, it's as happy or miserable as you want to make it"
Forum whore
Excellent. Back on topic??!
Political correctness: a doctrine which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd from the clean end.
Fully qualified Sifter.
How's this...
http://cultso.com/artist-takes-every...fter-each-use/
Rasta Ratskins
That guy is seriously talented...and fucked up!
I loved the mushroom one, but sadly this guy if he wasn't already will be a psycho ward loiterer.
Only a Rat can win a Rat Race!
Fully qualified Sifter.
Yeah he certainly gave himself a severe thrashing.
Que?
Some of those portraits bear a striking resemblance to a certain Harley-riding KBer, randomly enough.
Forum whore
Least you could lay a formal complaint if the tinnies were a bit stink
To laugh often and much; to win the respect of intelligent people and the affection of children; to earn the appreciation of honest critics and to endure the betrayal of false friends. To appreciate beauty; to find the best in others; to leave the world a bit better whether by a healthy child, a garden patch, or a redeemed social condition; to know that even one life has breathed easier because you have lived. This is to have succeeded
Hardcore Biker
Thought they was supposed to stinkLeast you could lay a formal complaint if the tinnies were a bit stink
Forum whore
The "other" stink!Thought they was supposed to stink
To laugh often and much; to win the respect of intelligent people and the affection of children; to earn the appreciation of honest critics and to endure the betrayal of false friends. To appreciate beauty; to find the best in others; to leave the world a bit better whether by a healthy child, a garden patch, or a redeemed social condition; to know that even one life has breathed easier because you have lived. This is to have succeeded
Come warm yourself by the fire
But a CORPORATION CAN NOT BE A PERSON.....
see here in your precious legal dictionary http://legal-dictionary.thefreedicti...om/corporation
Note also that if you use your exclusion principle above. Inclusio unius est exclusio alterius. That it is latin so its back to front in terms of "meaning". It (as the name states) is the exclusion principle, not the inclusion principle. So you can't state that a person contains a corporation - you must state that if only one thing is covered under inclusion - then all else are excluded.
i.e. if the inclusion of "PERSON" is the exclusion of all others.
Not that a corporation can have multiple people under inclusion, so the firm name is stated with the identified members in following text. If no members of the corporation are liable then the corporation itself is liable as it is its own entity. Therefore only the corporation is named.
If you don't believe me then why can't we get euthanasia in NZ - it would be very easy to argue that the board associated with "JOHN SMITH" have performed to a low level standard of care, and the corporation therefore will be placed into liquidation.
These are all things than can be done with a corporation. So is people are considered corporations, it should be legal. Could it perhaps be that a corporation is not a person? or a collection of people but its own entity?
Reactor Online. Sensors Online. Weapons Online. All Systems Nominal.
KB's Chief Cats
that is quite impressive. considering he managed to actually DO anything after some of those drugs.
a person is a corporation. interpretation act. (that's NZ legislation.) i've posted this before. i will not again just for the benefit of the daft.
"my precious law dictionary" is not online. it's leather and has paper and stuff. i do not believe that the legislators use the internet as a source, as you and figgy seem to.
if they do. you have bigger problems than defining words. which, funny enough, is exactly what the INTERPRETATION ACT is for.
i never cited an exclusion principle. i cited the legal maxim that "the inclusion of one is the exclusion of all others". i'm sure your internet will tell you all about it.
"why can't we get euthenasia"
wow. read some legislation. it's all in there.
we also can't get books on euthanasia, or how the holocaust never happened, or one called "sensemillia". anything by greg hallet will get you red flagged...
why can't we get these? because your duly elected socialist leaders have decided that you shouldn't have them.
if YOU don't believe ME then how can the "crown" dictate what a man who was presumably born free, must do, even against his will... take his kids, say how fast he can drive, take the money off the sweat of his back etc etc etc.
hrm. how can they do that? legally, or lawfully?
KB's Chief Cats
it seems you're missing the fundamental fact that you are not a person, legally speaking, the men you see in the street are not persons, they guy at the gassy is not a person, noone on the bus, dole, no CEO, banker or politician is a person.
a PERSON is a LEGAL construct, it has nothing to do with a skeleton, organs or sentient consciousness.
google or online-law-dictionary "capitus diminutio maxima". this is the last time i will say this. i feel i need to state that, for the benfit of the daft.
if you have any intelligent queries, can cite a source that is not the internet/wikipedia/google, or any constructive discourse to add, feel free.
elsewise. good day to you.
Loud and Uncouth
Winding up drongos, foil hat wearers and over sensitive KBers for over 14,000 posts...........
" Life is not a rehearsal, it's as happy or miserable as you want to make it"
Fully qualified Sifter.
I agree 100%
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks