Rossi needs to kick some arse if he wants to top Ago's record of GP wins.
Rossi needs to kick some arse if he wants to top Ago's record of GP wins.
Cheers
Merv
those two yamaha men better not fight too hard or they might fing pedrosa will benefit
Agostini was a great rider for sure, however there were only a handfull of Factory bikes with maybe Phil Reed and a few others on competitive bikes. If you look back through the old books and history you will see the evidence. The modern riders have incredible odds to compete with. Agostini had it comparitively easy.
Dovi’s off to Ducati.
Win-win for him really. If he isn't able to put the bike on the podium, he just points at Vale and shrugs; if (Audi make) Ducati make the bike competitive, he gets kudos.
I'll be so happy if Dovi or Nicky take a win next year.
Be interesting to see how Dovi gets along with the Ducati. It's a significantly different beast to the Yamaha which seemed to suit him so well.
Management is exactly the thing that has to change. They've proven that since Stoner won on the Ducati they've been unable to produce a competitive, rideable bike. They've literally thrown away complete designs and started from scratch a couple of times and still it's only good for 5th or a crash.
Zen wisdom: No matter what happens, somebody will find a way to take it too seriously. - obviously had KB in mind when he came up with that gem
Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity
Isn't there a bit of the age old argument asking if your are being persistant and trying to refine a design, or that your just flogging a dead horse and need to start new. Ducati has gone for three totally different chassy designs since they got into MotoGP (steel trellis, CF, and now Al beam) where as everyone else has more or less just stuck with the Al beam frame (other then a couple of the privateers doing steel trellis).
So Ducati started MotoGP in 2003 (correct me if I'm wrong) and have had 3 frame types, going from steel trellis ('03-'06), CF ('07-'11) and now Al beam. Seems a bit like they are good at coming up with new ideas, and engineering them, but then put them out there and are a bit lackadasical about trying to refine those designs. If you look back at Honda and Yamaha especially, ther have had more or less the same overall design for both chassi and engine through each iteration of the Moto GP class (990, 800 and 1000), but have been introducing new parts and tweaking things as the season goes to try and find what works.
Seems like Ducati just throw out a design, lazily change a couple of things in a season or two, then wad up that design and throw and completely new design at the problem. Do they not understand the concept of the scientific method? You know, change one thing at a time so that you can tell what actually made a differance in performance.
Disclaimer: I don't actually know what I'm talking about and everything I say should be taken as words of wisdom from a armchair general/mechanic/engineer/racer.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks