You reckon this will happen? http://superbikeplanet.com/2012/Sep/120924rc32.htm
You reckon this will happen? http://superbikeplanet.com/2012/Sep/120924rc32.htm
Cheers
Merv
Drew for Prime Minister!
www.oldskoolperformance.com
www.prospeedmc.com for parts ex U.S.A ( He's a Kiwi! )
The need to stop being Gay and just get the F on with it. Aprilia did ................
I wouldnt be surprised, and it makes sense, all the time and money spent developing the V4 and V5 bikes, I had expected honda to take a leaf out of yamaha's book by now and promote the 'same engine type on YOUR ride as stoner and pedrosa ride' like yamaha has with the crossplane.
and most of the manufacturers are overdue for a serious change up in their flagship sports bikes anyway.
Hope it's a closer representation than the Ducati was. That thing shares nothing but wheel size with the GP bike!
Honda definitely had a strong V motor back in the day, pity they fluffed around with that stupid 400 piece and didn't just keep developing the 750/1000.
Oh I don't know if I could take that... another proper V4 - don't tell me it's gonna gear driven cams as well or I'm going to need a moment to conduct myself![]()
You only need two tools in life:
Duct tape if it moves and it shouldn't.
WD-40 if it doesn't move and it should.
Brute force and ignorance always prevails.
Failure comes from too little brute force, or
too little ignorance.
If its the real thing it would have pneumatic valves too.
Cheers
Merv
cause they fucked the reputation of the V Four early in the piece by using the public as a test bed, and failing. I was at the six hour when nearly every V Four died a horrible death two laps after a pit stop. Why cause the fan switched off with the ignition, from memory the one that didn't fuck out had the fan bypassed so if it was hot when you stopped at least some cooling occurred. The fact that the barrells were par tof the crankcases and not a simple rebuild didn't help. These were the chain drive models, the earlier shafties had already let us down with their chocolate cams and then the bad batch of VF500 where they forgot to chamfer the crank journals left F All people who had faith in a V Four.
Jelly, of course our later V4s are fantastic, but really the V4 first got such a bad rep initially in my lifetime with the Ford Transit van and the Zephyr 4.
Yay for Bill Biber and Phil Payne.
Cheers
Merv
Bloody hell you're a knowledgeable ol' coont. I knew about the cams being soft, (I owned a VF750f), but was unaware of all the other failings. I had prolly registered the barrels being part of teh cases, but not given it any though.
I'd put that down to a space concern now that I am giving it a minute. Not having to make a big flat surface to bolt barrells to is quite a good way to keep it compact.
Back in 1989, I owned an '86 VF500F. I have to say that was a beautiful machine. Lovely engine,..very torquey (for it's size) and smooth. Could have had a better rear shock,..but that would have been easily fixed. Why they didn't develop THAT motor into a 600 is beyond me. It was far better than the 400 and the 750 also.
From what Jellywrestler said about them,..my model had all of the failings fixed from the '85 500's.
"...you meet the weirdest people riding a Guzzi !!..."
V-Four engines are gorgeous. Expensive to build and maintain compared to an inline though.
Honda are in trouble if they need to look back at old stuff to inspire the new....
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks