Fuck our legal system

[imdying]

Ok. I'll play the devils advocate.

An easy position to take when you still have both of your legs.

[Parlane]

Ok. I'll play the devils advocate.

Does anyone know what part of the motorway?
Because most Auckland motorways have huge concrete barriers, yeah?
Meaning he didn't just slip over the line, his drunkenness made him lose awareness of which side of the road to drive on in New Zealand.
He should have to go through the entire [now extra] lengthy process of obtaining a licence from the beginning after that.

[oneofsix]

Does anyone know what part of the motorway?
Because most Auckland motorways have huge concrete barriers, yeah?
Meaning he didn't just slip over the line, his drunkenness made him lose awareness of which side of the road to drive on in New Zealand.
He should have to go through the entire [now extra] lengthy process of obtaining a licence from the beginning after that.

I think you will find he went down the off ramp. He was also driving without lights.

[nathanwhite]

An easy position to take when you still have both of your legs.

lets not turn this into an ad homiem argument. Theres enough of that in the beehive.

Does anyone know what part of the motorway?
Because most Auckland motorways have huge concrete barriers, yeah?
Meaning he didn't just slip over the line, his drunkenness made him lose awareness of which side of the road to drive on in New Zealand.
He should have to go through the entire [now extra] lengthy process of obtaining a licence from the beginning after that.

Yeah, would have gone on the off ramp.

Lost license minimum

[imdying]

lets not turn this into an ad homiem argument. Theres enough of that in the beehive.

What a load of nonsense, the completely unnecessary loss of the riders legs and how much this piece of shit should suffer is the only argument.

[HenryDorsetCase]

THey are not .. who said he was devout? Just like Christians are not allowed sex outside marriage ...

so the issue is the illiterate or semi literate rantings of a bronze age book of myths?

good to know.

[HenryDorsetCase]

I am all for stoning the gulty. However for this is a person who has done something once, and regretted it after. I think the punishment is not excessive.
It is repeat offenders I have no tolerance for. If he does it again, hang, draw and quarter him.

maybe. If what you say is true. if however it is spin or lies then no. But we dont and will never know that because we werent in Court tohear the evidence, hmmm?

[oneofsix]

THey are not .. who said he was devout? Just like Christians are not allowed sex outside marriage ...

The article described him as a devout Muslim. Yea yea reporters and all and that is what I was digging at. It probably just meant he chose not to swear on the bible due to his muslim heritage or what ever so some hack decides that makes him devout.

[Brett]

I would like to add to your thread, the story of Christie Marceau. http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/ar...ectid=10841254

How the fuck did this dickhead get not guilty be reason of insanity? Since when could you plot and strategically plan to kill someone for months, even if the voices in your head are telling you to, and then carry out the plan and still get a not guilty verdict? Yes the cunt may be held in the nut house, but IF he were to ever be released (probably in 15 or so years knowing this country) he will have no criminal record?

[oneofsix]

I would like to add to your thread, the story of Christie Marceau. http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/ar...ectid=10841254

How the fuck did this dickhead get not guilty be reason of insanity? Since when could you plot and strategically plan to kill someone for months, even if the voices in your head are telling you to, and then carry out the plan and still get a not guilty verdict? Yes the cunt may be held in the nut house, but IF he were to ever be released (probably in 15 or so years knowing this country) he will have no criminal record?

Tin hat time. He gets away with it because the legal system fucked up in letting him out in the first place.

She warned them he would kill her. Why the fuck didn't they get the physcos to look at him before paroling him. She says he is a murderous fucktard, he says he is remorseful so they believe him and let the bastard out

[HenryDorsetCase]

I would like to add to your thread, the story of Christie Marceau. http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/ar...ectid=10841254

How the fuck did this dickhead get not guilty be reason of insanity? Since when could you plot and strategically plan to kill someone for months, even if the voices in your head are telling you to, and then carry out the plan and still get a not guilty verdict? Yes the cunt may be held in the nut house, but IF he were to ever be released (probably in 15 or so years knowing this country) he will have no criminal record?

ranting aside, the big issue I have with that is bail. he was on bail for threatening to rape and kill her and I believe stalking her.and maybe kidnapping or attempting to kidnap her. And bail was granted and he was on bail when he killed her. Not cool.

One other reason why we should allow concealed carry handguns here. If she had had one and known how to use it: no problem

[HenryDorsetCase]

Not to hijack the thread, but you've all seen this and given it your support, yes? If not, why not?

http://www.christieslaw.co.nz/

[BoristheBiter]

ranting aside, the big issue I have with that is bail. he was on bail for threatening to rape and kill her and I believe stalking her.and maybe kidnapping or attempting to kidnap her. And bail was granted and he was on bail when he killed her. Not cool.

One other reason why we should allow concealed carry handguns here. If she had had one and known how to use it: no problem

Fuck concealing them. let the fuckers know exactly whats coming.

[nathanwhite]

H

I can see absolutely no reason whatsoever that he should not be killed for his actions.

What a load of nonsense, the completely unnecessary loss of the riders legs and how much this piece of shit should suffer is the only argument.

I'm not arguing. I'm stating my position that if he is truly remorseful for his actions, then what he has is enough.

I can see absolutely no reason whatsoever that he should not be killed for his actions.

[Brett]

ranting aside, the big issue I have with that is bail. he was on bail for threatening to rape and kill her and I believe stalking her.and maybe kidnapping or attempting to kidnap her. And bail was granted and he was on bail when he killed her. Not cool.

One other reason why we should allow concealed carry handguns here. If she had had one and known how to use it: no problem

Agree with all of that 100%.