Bear in mind the blog was written on 3rd March. This was after all of this had gone down and my withdrawal had gone in. I actually ran the emails to Rainsforth Dix through my partner first to make sure I wasn't coming across as anything other than someone with an opinion and a vested interest. Reading them now, I don't think they sound belligerent; I'm more of the opinion that Dix's reaction was always going to be take it or leave it.
Looking at her history though, it doesn't take much for her to get a stick up her arse about things. She doesn't have a good history with students or people who complain to her. I think she was just a little insulted that I didn't jump at the chance of getting $20 from Arana.
We'll see what happens. I either have a career here, or I've fucked it. NZ gets one less caretaker, or one less PhD and one less lawyer (don't think anyone would be too sad about that though).
Thanks for reading, everyone, anyway.
Yes - I agree .. and what the uni did is not what I would call "restorative justice" at all. In any restorative process that ahs any chance of workign the victim has to agree .. and in this case they did not .. so the uni should have dropped the restorative justice approach instead of proceeding and producing this piece of bullshit .. that effectively lets the perp off with no consequences.
How was anything "restored" here???
"So if you meet me, have some sympathy, have some courtesy, have some taste ..."
"So if you meet me, have some sympathy, have some courtesy, have some taste ..."
I was in the process of employing a couple of new drivers a few weeks ago.
We had a guy come in with tons of promise and gave him a trial on the basis that his medical and drugs test all came back clean.
He didn't do his drug test on the day of appointment and said he was worried cause he had a joint a couple of weeks back.
So i asked him his level of use and he replied with "hardly ever just the odd weekend,".
So we decided to give him a second chance and allowed him a week to clear his system so as to get a clean test.
Once done we sent him back in for another test on a Monday and low and behold he decided he wanted different type of work all of a sudden.
So he moved onto another company driving trucks (thought he wanted to do different type of work, ODD!)
Got a phone call from the company asking of his back ground, of coarse after the discussion they decided to take him in for drug test, no getting out of this one as they were near enough to holding his hand.
You guessed it, he failed miserably and i believe he is struggling to gain employment anywhere. The transport industry network is spread far and wide.
so as far as giving 2nd chances, F***k that again!![]()
Trumpydom!
Not surprisingly ... but cannabis can be detected up to three months after the last use .. (that's a can be ... and not a will be ... depends on the person etc etc )
So the drug testing for work is actually quite hard on someone who smokes .. even occassionally and only at weekends ... if you want to pass the tests and continue to pass the tests the answer is don't smoke at all ...
"So if you meet me, have some sympathy, have some courtesy, have some taste ..."
lets just de-rail this thread a bit. he had tons of promise, obviously interviewed well, could probably drive a truck like a motherfucker, references probably came back ok, he turns up for work on time, all the time...
so what do you care if he has a joint after dinner, rather than a beer?
or would you rather a crackhead, who could pass a drug test after a weekend off?
no i think it's a fairly fair question. all this drug test crap doesn't count for shit, really. as the people who you think should have the job, probably should.
the drop kicks, well, it's an easy and legal way to tell them to fuck off. (because "you're a dropkick" might hurt their precious little egos)
all up for reform.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks