In this day and age? Surely not... although there was this little country in Europe
In this day and age? Surely not... although there was this little country in Europe
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
Were I actually agree to some point from both sides, the old Labour party removed the PEP scheme's as they said it took jobs from others.
This was bollocks as those jobs would not be done as they didn't have money for them in the first place.
I am not saying they should be made to do hard labour, they need time to find a full time job.
So if you think that expecting something in return is unreasonable we should just stop handing out money and keep it for those working.
The 14 Defining Characteristics Of Fascism
1. Goes without saying. Too many country's have this sort of driver. We are NZ'ers, not Maori. Well you are. I'm a Earthling.
2. GCSB for one.
3. The politial party's.
4. Bought any new tech lately? 1/2 point
5. Tricky one... although legislation in regards to how a fmaily can conduct it's business ticks this box, that and women not earning the same as men because they're, erm, women.
6. Nuff said.
7. GCSB for one.
8. --------------
9. Nuff said.
10. Nuff said.
11. Anyone seen an assault on the education system recently? The media are good lapdogs for this trick.
12. 1/2 point
13. Nuff said.
14. Wouldn't put it past them at all. 1/2 point
11.5 out of 14. Good score. Hardly surprising so many on here are fascists, it's how you're brought up.
Let's do the same experiment with "my" way under the microscope
1. Not really. We'll be all but borderless... but as there will likely be an initial pride in the accomplishment of the country toachieve that which no country has ever achieved, we'll thro in a 1/2 point.
2. Quite the opposite... unless the capitalists get out of hand of course.
3. Nope.
4. Bwaaaaa ha ha ha ha haaaaaaa.
5. Rampant sex perhaps, but no need to distinguish who's doing what to which gender.
6. Not a chance.
7. Nope. Everything will be free after all.
8. Nope.
9. Nope.
10. Nope.
11. Nope.
12. Nope.
13. Nope.
14. Nope.
Well fuck me. A resounding 1/2 point.
So, you're either a fascist by choice or a fascist by association. If the former, than you must be popular in all of the wrong places... if the latter, then baaaaaaaa. Have a nice day.
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
I got as far as 2.
You are saying that the GCSB engenders "Disdain for the Recognition of Human Rights" So as to make "The people tend to look the other way or even approve of torture, summary executions, assassinations, long incarcerations of prisoners, etc."
I was wondering why I had a sore neck - it's all this looking the other whilst people are killed and tortured in NZ.
The only thing that's being tortured here is good sense.
You have reached new lows in your moronic rants...
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
In many ways I do agree with you ... the welfare system was a safety net for people who needed it ... if you don't need it don't bludge of it - incuding old age pensions .... (And before you all hit the roof - do you really think it is fair that multi-millionaire John Key, when he leaves Parliament, will get a Parliamentary superannuation of 80% of his income when he leaves - for the rest of his life - is also entitled to National Super ??? - plenty of other examples)
However, in the contemporary world (if the word has too many syllables for you contemporary means Modern ) there is structural unemployment - there are more workers than jobs - which means there are more people who need a safety net to survive - to feed themselves and their families.
If there were more jobs than workers, then I would say No Work No Money .. however that is just not he xase, and recently Judtih Collins admitted it would probably never be so again.
So the question remains - how do we deal with people who are unemployed? Sure they can do voluntary work - but they still need to feed, house and clothe themselves and their families - that takes MONEY not voluntary work ...
So we do need some sort of safety net . adn it needs to be woerkable, fair, and not open to rip offs - but that's pretty hard - people are real good at working out ways to get extra ... How many of you all complaining here about benefit rip offs do it in other small ways .. use employer's material adn time when you know you shouldn't .. use internet time (people have been charged with theft as a servant for that - and convicted and sentenced.) .. throw a sickie ...
So - stop blaming people who are out of work for their misfortune ..
I agree with:
There needs to be a safety net to support peopel who have no job (it's nottheir fault they have no job)
People who refuse to work get no dole ... (it's their own fault they have no job)
However, people who refuse to work do have families (wives and children) ... the faults of the parent is not those of the children (yet) . so how do you support the wives and children if the adult refusese to work ... These can be the victims .. and may well become the perpetrators in the future ... unless something is done at at early stage.
"So if you meet me, have some sympathy, have some courtesy, have some taste ..."
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
I think you have me all wrong. I was not saying take away the benefit that we have in place, I was just saying that for one day a week, or whatever they could put something back into their local community.
Why should we as a community pay for someone else's family if they are not prepared to work for them?
[QUOTE=Banditbandit;1130547489]
So the question remains - how do we deal with people who are unemployed? Sure they can do voluntary work - but they still need to feed, house and clothe themselves and their families - that takes MONEY not voluntary work ...
So we do need some sort of safety net . adn it needs to be woerkable, fair, and not open to rip offs - but that's pretty hard - people are real good at working out ways to get extra ... How many of you all complaining here about benefit rip offs do it in other small ways .. use employer's material adn time when you know you shouldn't .. use internet time (people have been charged with theft as a servant for that - and convicted and sentenced.) .. throw a sickie ...
So - stop blaming people who are out of work for their misfortune ..
/QUOTE]
Mental disease and poor parenting....
Its the same all over the west, a disenfranchised class costing the tax payer
So create an inclusive environment for them, an alternative world, like another dimension, seemlessly living beside this present world in harmony
practically speaking, kibbutz style residential farms with cheap cabins walk to toilet thingy, [bring unused or non producing farms back into production]
have a business model of low volume high income boutique crops like herbs etc which could be a perk for the crazies
urban communities that can successfully instill hope and purpose without scorn or derision ie retard moron etc
cause many peeps are mentally challenged and all sorts of brain crazy
Mental health in the west is in a very poor state of utter bollocks, and the tax payer is footing the bill
Winding up drongos, foil hat wearers and over sensitive KBers for over 14,000 posts...........![]()
" Life is not a rehearsal, it's as happy or miserable as you want to make it"
Unfortunately true... and a society that refuses to catch those "ignored" children because it isn't their job to boot. Society should know better. Meanwhile the good parents have to work 40 hrs a week and spend less time with their kids, not really knowing who they are or what they're up to coz they haven't got a clue what the kid is actually like from the 2-3 hours a day they get with them. And they wonder why "good" kids go "bad". That shit needs to change eh dawg? Economy v's Society... never both in the same breath.
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
Yes I can put a spin on those 14 points. But within that spin there is a large element or truth. And as highlighted brilliantly by Oscar, no reason to go looking to see if that is the case given that you simply don't believe that it could be possible to consider NZ to be a fascist run country. It ticks a lot of them boxes in one way or another when taking NZ's role as an equal country in a global community into consideration... but as you point out, only if you decide to question NZ in that light.
You chose not to. Fair enough. Remain a sheeple.
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks