False flag chemical attacks in Syria. Just shut your eyes and ignore it like sheep

[flyingcrocodile46]

Apparently the motion being put to Congress limits involvement to 33 months.

One report stated the latest attack was the first time chemical weapons had been used in Syria.
A couple of days later it was the fourteenth time chemical weapons had been used.

Another example that clearly demonstrates that American Intelligence is an oxymoron.

If the use of chemical weapons is so abhorrent to the Americans should they get rid of their chemical weapons?
Should they stop manufacturing and selling chemical weapons?

Their anger at the Russians making a mockery of the UN by blocking their motion at the Security Council is laughable.
Ignoring the dozens of motions that they have blocked concerning Israel.

Can't bling ya, gotta spread it around.

This is a sarcastic but pretty factual look at the absurdity of Obama's position...... Eyeball deep in shit from the inside out.

[jonbuoy]

If they want to help why don't they drop antidotes and medical supplies for the doctors and medics . This "stop killing each other or we will kill you" mind set doesn't seem to working out.

[flyingcrocodile46]

If they want to help why don't they drop antidotes and medical supplies for the doctors and medics . This "stop killing each other or we will kill you" mind set doesn't seem to working out.

Particularly when the Saudis and Qatar are currently bankrolling air drops of weapons and mercenaries and are openly offerring to pay for the US to bomb Syria

[awa355]

Can't bling ya, gotta spread it around.

This is a sarcastic but pretty factual look at the absurdity of Obama's position...... Eyeball deep in shit from the inside out.

Watched the complete video. It confirms what many have always believed.

[oldrider]

OK watched and listened to that supercilious cunt and even though I believe he is probably correct in what he claims, who the fuck is he?

I was born into a scary world (WW2) it has always been a scary world and it looks like nothing is ever going to change on that score either!

People like that presenter are no better than the people they are attempting to condemn ... the world is just so full of shit in every direction!

Obama's claim that he (USA) needs to fight fire with fire is just plain fucking dumb and can not be justified under any pretence... end of story!

[Oscar]

Obama's claim that he (USA) needs to fight fire with fire is just plain fucking dumb and can not be justified under any pretence... end of story!

Damed if you do...

The US and UN is still being pillored for standing by during the Rwandan disgrace.
They could have saved any number of people quite easily, but 900,000 died whilst the UN dithered.

[Katman]

Damed if you do...

The US and UN is still being pillored for standing by during the Rwandan disgrace.
They could have saved any number of people quite easily, but 900,000 died whilst the UN dithered.

You say it was the UN that dithered but did the US actually have any intention of intervening in Rwanda?

I think not - they would have done so regardless of the UN's dithering if there had been any gain in it for them.

[Oscar]

You say it was the UN that dithered but did the US actually have any intention of intervening in Rwanda?

I think not - they would have done so regardless of the UN's dithering if there had been any gain in it for them.

That is true.
They had nothing to gain and didn't interven and those people are dead.
So because they may have something to gain in Syria, more people get to die?

Why do we sign treaties to control war crimes (and the ban on gas is one of the oldest), if there are no consequences?

[Katman]

Why do we sign treaties to control war crimes (and the ban on gas is one of the oldest), if there are no consequences?

Do you really think that the US has the moral right to be the enforcer of those consequences given their past record?

[Banditbandit]

[Oscar]

Do you really think that the US has the moral right to be the enforcer of those consequences given their past record?

Nope. But who else is gonna do it?
The UN?

[Banditbandit]

Why should anyone do it ??? Why should we interfer with the internal issues of another sovereign nation?

[SPman]

If the use of chemical weapons is so abhorrent to the Americans should they get rid of their chemical weapons?
Should they stop manufacturing and selling chemical weapons?

Their anger at the Russians making a mockery of the UN by blocking their motion at the Security Council is laughable.
Ignoring the dozens of motions that they have blocked concerning Israel.

In 1997, the United States agreed to decommission the 31,000 tonnes of sarin, VX, mustard gas and other agents it possessed within 10 years. In 2007 it requested the maximum extension of the deadline permitted by the Chemical Weapons Convention: five years. Again it failed to keep its promise, and in 2012 it claimed they would be gone by 2021.........

83 times the US has exercised its veto. On 42 of these occasions it has done so to prevent Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians from being censured. On the last occasion, 130 nations supported the resolution, but Obama spiked it. Though veto powers have been used less often since the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991, the US has exercised them 14 times since then (in 13 cases to shield Israel), while Russia has used them 9 times. Increasingly the permanent members have used the threat of a veto to prevent a resolution from being discussed. They have bullied the rest of the world into silence.

From 1964.........

[flyingcrocodile46]

Kerry put his foot in Obama's mouth when Russia & Syria leapt on his disingenuous statement when he was...

"Asked during a stop in London whether there was anything Syrian President Bashar al-Assad's government could do or offer that would stop an attack, Kerry said that al-Assad "could turn over every single bit of his chemical weapons to the international community in the next week" -- adding, "He isn't about to do it, and it can't be done, obviously."

It must have been a heck of a jolt when Russia took the initiative and came up with plan B .. and that Syria have agreed to it.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013...rike-on-syria/

LMAO Gonna have trouble squeezing that one back in the tube now. Looks like Obama is going to have to run with it. Crisis averted... maybe...

For another month.

I like how Obama inadvertently wasted one of his trump cards (authorisation to initiate military strikes if he believes the US security is threatened) when he responded to Assad's inference that Syria could retaliate against the US if attacked.. by saying ......
http://edition.cnn.com/2013/09/09/wo...war/index.html ....

"But on CNN's "The Situation Room," Obama snapped back that Syria is no threat to the United States.
"Mr. Assad doesn't have a lot of capability," Obama said. "He has capability relative to children. He has capability relative to an opposition that is still getting itself organized and are not professional, trained fighters. He doesn't have a credible means to threaten the United States."

LMAO the arrogant fool will have that thrown in his face when he suggests that he might unilaterally decide he is authorised to attack Syria if he believed they posed a credible threat to the US. Lol

[flyingcrocodile46]

In 1997, the United States agreed to decommission the 31,000 tonnes of sarin, VX, mustard gas and other agents it possessed within 10 years. In 2007 it requested the maximum extension of the deadline permitted by the Chemical Weapons Convention: five years. Again it failed to keep its promise, and in 2012 it claimed they would be gone by 2021.........

I wonder which countries they will "decommission" them in?