Page 6 of 34 FirstFirst ... 4567816 ... LastLast
Results 76 to 90 of 510

Thread: Drug testing?

  1. #76
    Join Date
    17th July 2005 - 22:28
    Bike
    Dougcati, Geoff and Suzi
    Location
    Banjo town
    Posts
    10,162
    I agree with the drug testing idea. I do understand the presence of THC doesn't have to mean the person is impaired, which can be an issue. If it were legal it would be a.different story I suppose.

    Having worked in mental health and seen the long term effects of many kinds of substance use, and abuse, I would advise against heavy pot smoking. But that's another thread, which has been done to death and all the speculative and supposed facts have already been shared, and it is still an illegal substance. Get the the fuck over it.
    Quote Originally Posted by Paul in NZ View Post
    Ha...Thats true but life is full horrible choices sometimes Merv. Then sometimes just plain stuff happens... and then some more stuff happens.....




    Alloy, stainless and Ti polishing.
    Bling your bike out!
    PM me

  2. #77
    Join Date
    6th January 2007 - 16:52
    Bike
    Other peoples weapons....
    Location
    Taupo
    Posts
    4,708
    I can't wait to get on a 747 next time and hope like hell my pilot is stoned.......


    Keep 'intoxicated' people off the track.
    Or if they want to do it, let them do track days by themselves, just not around me or my friends.
    Is it still beastiality if ya fuck a frozen chicken??

  3. #78
    Join Date
    29th July 2006 - 09:19
    Bike
    WR269f, WR450f
    Location
    Napier
    Posts
    2,585
    Quote Originally Posted by SMOKEU View Post
    We need to hold the individual user responsible for their own actions, and stop passing the blame. If I fuck up, then I am willing to admit fault and accept the repercussions, rather than using society as a scapegoat. If people are addicted to gambling, then it's THEIR fault, not the pokies. No one forced the gambler to gamble. They CHOOSE to gamble. If people drink too much alcohol and cause problems, again, it was their CHOICE to drink alcohol and act like a complete fuckwit.
    Choice being the key word here.................its really simple, if ya choose to race, then you'll have to choose to not take drugs. Who cares how or what tests they use, if the choice to race was made then you'll accept that test will be carried out.

    Better to accept a test before a "fuck up" happens that could involve others.

    Seeing as this is about testing in racing that's all that needs to be said really.

    All about CHOICE eh?

  4. #79
    Join Date
    13th December 2008 - 18:22
    Bike
    Your mom
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    3,901
    Quote Originally Posted by haydes55 View Post
    I'm all for legalising weed, but this topic is about testing, not legalising.

    As it stands weed is illegal, the government has deemed it as a harmful substance with risks associated with consumption (whether medical or social). As an entity SNZ are required to represent racers to promote the sport, assist running meetings and do their best to ensure any action to improve chances of safety are taken.

    SNZ is not big enough to conduct studies and determine if a certain level of THC is safe or not, nor should it be their issue. There is no line to draw because any level will be challenged. If they say you must have below x.xxg/L of THC in your system to race, the police would rape SNZ in court if they investigate a crash.

    The current rule is zero tolerance. Same with alcohol. If a racer blows a 0.001 on the breathalyzer they get a 12 month ban.
    If the rider is hungover from a heavy alcohol drinking session the night before, then they might not have any alcohol in their breath, yet they will certainly be impaired in some way, possibly to a more significant extent than if they had been smoking dope just before the race. How do you propose to legislate against that?

    Quote Originally Posted by scrivy View Post
    I can't wait to get on a 747 next time and hope like hell my pilot is stoned.......
    As long as the PIC is "straight", then if the FO is a bit peeled and they're the PF then it doesn't really matter, as the PIC can take over at any stage. If they're doing a complicated instrument approach then it's probably best not to be high though, as the chances of fucking up will be a bit high. Although I'm sure the Cunts Against Aviation would have something to say about that, but they're always out to be a buzz kill.

  5. #80
    Join Date
    13th November 2011 - 15:32
    Bike
    '09 Bandit 1250s
    Location
    Hamilton
    Posts
    2,135
    If they were hung over, they would show above 0.001 BAC.

    No one can legislate against every threat, but drugs are very easy to legislate against and enforce.

    Several officials also have the power to remove anyone from racing if it is an issue of safety. People have been put on the trailer whilst 100% sober.

  6. #81
    Join Date
    6th January 2007 - 16:52
    Bike
    Other peoples weapons....
    Location
    Taupo
    Posts
    4,708
    Quote Originally Posted by SMOKEU View Post
    As long as the PIC is "straight", then if the FO is a bit peeled and they're the PF then it doesn't really matter, as the PIC can take over at any stage. If they're doing a complicated instrument approach then it's probably best not to be high though, as the chances of fucking up will be a bit high. Although I'm sure the Cunts Against Aviation would have something to say about that, but they're always out to be a buzz kill.
    Okay, I'll rephrase what I said.... I hope both my pilots are stoned....... that'll make me feel better when I'm next flying..... NOT!

    I was a commercial pilot for a few years. If my FO was peeled, I wouldn't have gotten off the ground. Period. There's levels of redundancy in aviation for a reason......
    Instrument approaches are about 100 times easier to do, than controlling un-expected problems on the fly.

    Keep the 'under the influence' people of the track. Simple.
    Is it still beastiality if ya fuck a frozen chicken??

  7. #82
    Join Date
    15th February 2005 - 15:34
    Bike
    Katanasaurus Rex
    Location
    The Gates of Delirium
    Posts
    9,020
    Quote Originally Posted by scrivy View Post

    Keep the 'under the influence' people of the track. Simple.
    I don't think anyone is seriously suggesting that people should be allowed on the track 'under the influence'.

    As I've already said though, the presence of THC does not necessarily indicate impairment.

  8. #83
    Join Date
    27th February 2005 - 08:47
    Bike
    a red heap
    Location
    towel wronger
    Posts
    6,522
    this thread is full of rocket surgeons.

    If you want to race - don't take drugs, its the rules.

    I just had a full medical including drug test for a job interview. I didn't wank on about the flawed tests or my rights to smoke crack in my spare time, cos its the rules.

    Doing something often results in not being able to do something else, its called life, some people should get one.

  9. #84
    Join Date
    6th January 2007 - 16:52
    Bike
    Other peoples weapons....
    Location
    Taupo
    Posts
    4,708
    Quote Originally Posted by nodrog View Post
    this thread is full of rocket surgeons. Brain Scientists actually....
    If you want to race - don't take drugs, its the rules.

    I just had a full medical including drug test for a job interview. I didn't wank on about the flawed tests or my rights to smoke crack in my spare time, cos its the rules.

    Doing something often results in not being able to do something else, its called life, some people should get one.
    Did ya have to wank into a specimen pot......???
    Is it still beastiality if ya fuck a frozen chicken??

  10. #85
    Join Date
    25th March 2007 - 12:04
    Bike
    SPEED TRIPLE
    Location
    LA LA LAND
    Posts
    1,365
    Quote Originally Posted by scrivy View Post
    Did ya have to wank into a specimen pot......???
    It's my pink fortress thank you very much!
    No body move... I dropped my brain

  11. #86
    Join Date
    13th December 2008 - 18:22
    Bike
    Your mom
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    3,901
    Quote Originally Posted by nodrog View Post
    this thread is full of rocket surgeons.

    If you want to race - don't take drugs, its the rules.

    I just had a full medical including drug test for a job interview. I didn't wank on about the flawed tests or my rights to smoke crack in my spare time, cos its the rules.

    Doing something often results in not being able to do something else, its called life, some people should get one.
    Out of interest, is it a "dangerous" job involving the transport industry, forestry or heavy machinery?

  12. #87
    Join Date
    13th March 2006 - 20:49
    Bike
    TF125
    Location
    Hurunui, FTW!
    Posts
    4,430
    Quote Originally Posted by nodrog View Post
    this thread is full of rocket surgeons.

    If you want to race - don't take drugs, its the rules.

    I just had a full medical including drug test for a job interview. I didn't wank on about the flawed tests or my rights to smoke crack in my spare time, cos its the rules.

    Doing something often results in not being able to do something else, its called life, some people should get one.
    I've heard it's getting a lot harder to get a job at Macca's. Good luck

  13. #88
    Join Date
    5th April 2004 - 20:04
    Bike
    Exxon Valdez
    Location
    wellington
    Posts
    13,381
    Quote Originally Posted by Katman View Post
    I don't think anyone is seriously suggesting that people should be allowed on the track 'under the influence'.
    Really? Because it fucken sure sounds like you and some other cunts are.

    Quote Originally Posted by Katman View Post
    As I've already said though, the presence of THC does not necessarily indicate impairment.
    No, it doesn't. However, unless one of you stoner types can come up with a conclusive test to prove no impairment, don't smoke or don't race.

    This isn't that complicated an issue, I am not surprised by some of the fucken morons wanking on about their right to smoke weed though.

    Test away, and completely ban anyone found to have drugs in their system for a year. No matter what the drug is. Cunts be risking my life? Fuck that shit. You know most life insurance policies wont pay out if you die competing in motorsport aye?

  14. #89
    Join Date
    13th November 2011 - 15:32
    Bike
    '09 Bandit 1250s
    Location
    Hamilton
    Posts
    2,135
    Quote Originally Posted by Drew View Post
    Really? Because it fucken sure sounds like you and some other cunts are.

    No, it doesn't. However, unless one of you stoner types can come up with a conclusive test to prove no impairment, don't smoke or don't race.

    This isn't that complicated an issue, I am not surprised by some of the fucken morons wanking on about their right to smoke weed though.

    Test away, and completely ban anyone found to have drugs in their system for a year. No matter what the drug is. Cunts be risking my life? Fuck that shit. You know most life insurance policies wont pay out if you die competing in motorsport aye?







    a health insurance guy actually came to 2 speedway meetings. Half the club signed up. They now no longer insure speedway people haha... Unless you never cancel your insurance.

    No organisation, dedicated to rider safety should ever have to make allowances for illegal activities.

  15. #90
    Join Date
    13th March 2006 - 20:49
    Bike
    TF125
    Location
    Hurunui, FTW!
    Posts
    4,430
    Fuck you cunts are thick.


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •