
Originally Posted by
Madness
But by opting for the piss test you're eliminating anyone who may have been impaired to any level within the six weeks or more prior. The test exceeds the requirements.
Again, the reference to needles. Do you seriously think that when you go to the track & you're amongst your peers that you're amongst hyper dermic drug-users? I've been around a little while & I'm yet to come across anyone who has a few hits of P through a syringe and in all my years I've only ever heard third-party reference to cocaine use. Look up some stats, you're waffling on about drug issues that simply don't exist in this country on any significant scale.
So use a test that is more relevant to identifying impairment at the time of the sample being taken then if drugs before racing is the issue.
There is no burden to ensure people can partake in illegal activities, just as there is probably no burden to drug test in the first place, other than for a duty of care which should be track-safety oriented rather than a lifestyle qualification. The NZ Police do not conduct roadside random piss testing for Cannabis, are they therefore "ensuring people can partake in illegal activities"?
Out of the options being discussed here, the same one I'm recommending now.
So don't throw it out, I can see how convenient it is from an administrative and cost perspective. A suggestion might be to offer an optional mouth swab test at the cost of the racer, to be taken at the same time as the piss sample. Kind of like Drew's suggestion earlier, but less retarded. If they fail the piss test for THC but pass the mouth swab test, perhaps leniency could be applied, all at no cost to the organisation and in the interests of safety & fairness to competitors who may have had an innocent puff of on a Class-C marijuana cigarette some 6 weeks prior?
NZDDA will love it! Their sales just went up by 20%. It should stop the moaning within the ranks & I'll shut the fuck up.
What ya reckon?
Bookmarks