I have worked in IT for 27 years and have never found it necessary for my drugs to be tested.
"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin (1706-90)
"I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending to much liberty than those attending too small a degree of it." - Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826)
"Motorcycling is not inherently dangerous. It is, however, EXTREMELY unforgiving of inattention, ignorance, incompetence and stupidity!" - Anonymous
"Live to Ride, Ride to Live"
I would just like to mention that a lot of employers probably use drug testing as an indirect h&s check. As in if said employee is willing to break the law by using illicit substances, then what other laws/rules/guidelines might they choose to ignore?
Not saying it's necessarily right, but that it is another viewpoint to consider. I realise the whole because he speeds means he might assault people too is quite far from the truth, but job seeking is a competitive environment. Culling the competition makes choosing easier.
Same as how the RNZAF won't take pilots without the required NCEA results. 1000s of applications for 3 jobs a year need to be culled somehow.
Yeah, nah.
for fuck sake did you read the whole paragraph? or just leap into a response?
As I alluded to, no 'test' is perfect. staying up late is something that isnt accounted for, just like the drug tests currently used will not detect a variety of other drugs, fuck, Ive known driver to run dual log books - theres another way around the system.
My point was, in reply to Smokey, that sleep deprivation IS a focus in regard to H&S and employment etc
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks