Fuken science pricks and shit

[mashman]

Ok, so they too are scientists with every right to go through the peer reviewed process and publish their findings, so they are most certainly included in (and in fact required by) the process. It begs the question though, why haven't they?

The scientific community is not part of the government, the govt takes their findings and makes a decision. There is not some evil bias (govt or otherwise) in the scientific community, so stop trying to insinuate there is, instead explain why those experts who are sure fluoride poses a hazard have been unable to prove it?

I'd love an answer to that question too.

50 Reasons to Oppose Fluoridation is good enough for me. Make sure you validate every source in the biblio. If there isn't any bias, why aren't they working together? I'll insinuate what I like until they are working together, coz that doesn't happen by accident.

[bogan]

I'd love an answer to that question too.

50 Reasons to Oppose Fluoridation is good enough for me. Make sure you validate every source in the biblio. If there isn't any bias, why aren't they working together? I'll insinuate what I like until they are working together, coz that doesn't happen by accident.

I'll use 22) Fluoride may damage the brain, and 23) Fluoride may lower IQ as examples. Firstly, note the may used in each, because it has not been proven one way or another. Secondly, note the references used in those passages, clearly they are working together. Yet, neither the scientific community, nor the author of that article can say if fluoride damages the brain or lowers IQ.

[mashman]

I'll use 22) Fluoride may damage the brain, and 23) Fluoride may lower IQ as examples. Firstly, note the may used in each, because it has not been proven one way or another. Secondly, note the references used in those passages, clearly they are working together. Yet, neither the scientific community, nor the author of that article can say if fluoride damages the brain or lowers IQ.

Is Fluoride still in the water? Coz there's only 1 side asking for that. That'll remove any ambiguity and remove the other 48 reasons from having any significance.

[bogan]

Is Fluoride still in the water? Coz there's only 1 side asking for that. That'll remove any ambiguity and remove the other 48 reasons from having any significance.

Which side is that?

[mashman]

Which side is that?

Those who want fluoride removed from the water supply.

[bogan]

Those who want fluoride removed from the water supply.

The 1 side asking for it to still be in the water. Which side is that? It appears you have a lot of rage directed towards them, so if you could be specific about who they are, it'd go a long way to clearing up any disagreements...

[Akzle]

Who the fuck was talking about cancer???.

Your post was about flouride making people stupid and docile and easy to manage.

Ironic really.

huh. Click 3 pages ahead, where it says 'adverse effects'
i realise that would have been terribly hard for you to work out, but shit, chill honbre.

[oldrider]

Which side is that?

That will be me ... I am not against flouride or anything else ... I am against compulsary mass medication!

I am for personal choice, if I want flouride I should be free to make that choice!

I add things to my water for my perceived benefit at my own cost, I do not demand that you should be forced to accept the same shit!

Fuck compulsary mass medication ... period!

[mashman]

The 1 side asking for it to still be in the water. Which side is that? It appears you have a lot of rage directed towards them, so if you could be specific about who they are, it'd go a long way to clearing up any disagreements...

If you could stop projecting, in this instance rage, then you might have already seen the answer. But here's a hint.

Those who want fluoride removed from the water supply.

I don't know them personally so I can't be any more specific. If you had have asked, "which group do they belong to?", I would have responded with, those who want fluoride removed from the water.

[bogan]

If you could stop projecting, in this instance rage, then you might have already seen the answer. But here's a hint.



I don't know them personally so I can't be any more specific. If you had have asked, "which group do they belong to?", I would have responded with, those who want fluoride removed from the water.

Do try and read mashy, I'm not asking who wants it removed, I'm asking who wants it in there. You say there's only one side who wants that, so who are they?

That will be me ... I am not against flouride or anything else ... I am against compulsary mass medication!

I am for personal choice, if I want flouride I should be free to make that choice!

I add things to my water for my perceived benefit at my own cost, I do not demand that you should be forced to accept the same shit!

Fuck compulsary mass medication ... period!

I largely agree with that, and as per my answer to mashy, I wasn't asking who doesn't want it in there, but who does? I take issue with the slander people like to dish out against the smarter people in socienty who work pretty damn hard to give the whole lot (including the lazy/ignorant fucks) a better standard of living.

[puddytat]

And....what about chlorine in drinking water?
Murchison for example has so much chlorine in it that it smells like a public swimming pool.
the local environmental care group is funding a water testing regime to check the levels.
Dunno why we arnt switching to a U.V system...no doubt its because the T.D.C needs to pay for its new offices.
And the fuckers are going to close the Information centre, in an area that brings in close to 40 mill a year in tourism revenue in a town that relies on it.
But hey...the poor fucks at the cafes, petrol station, local supermarket will no doubt be really happy having loopies clogging up their counters asking where the Loos are, the camp grounds, Motels, B&B's,....
Rate revolt anyone...? Nah.

luckily my water comes of my Hills, but for how much longer will they allow me to drink my own water without fucking it with U.V? Im a firm believer that what doesn't kill you, makes you stronger.

[Laava]

And....what about chlorine in drinking water?
Murchison for example has so much chlorine in it that it smells like a public swimming pool.
the local environmental care group is funding a water testing regime to check the levels.
Dunno why we arnt switching to a U.V system...no doubt its because the T.D.C needs to pay for its new offices.
And the fuckers are going to close the Information centre, in an area that brings in close to 40 mill a year in tourism revenue in a town that relies on it.
But hey...the poor fucks at the cafes, petrol station, local supermarket will no doubt be really happy having loopies clogging up their counters asking where the Loos are, the camp grounds, Motels, B&B's,....
Rate revolt anyone...? Nah.

luckily my water comes of my Hills, but for how much longer will they allow me to drink my own water without fucking it with U.V? Im a firm believer that what doesn't kill you, makes you stronger.

True dat. You have to admit tho that if they do not treat the water they bear responsibility for any consequences. Thus the treatment. We looked into the UV system for our new water supply but opted for the simple paper filter type. So what if a few chunks of bird poo go through it!

[mashman]

Do try and read mashy, I'm not asking who wants it removed, I'm asking who wants it in there. You say there's only one side who wants that, so who are they?

Figure it out. It's not hard. If there are those who want to remove it, then those who................ else it would be removed.

[mashman]

luckily my water comes of my Hills, but for how much longer will they allow me to drink my own water without fucking it with U.V? Im a firm believer that what doesn't kill you, makes you stronger.

My old mans' water used to come off the hill filled with peat and most likely sheep piss. Fuckin delicious it were too and it was a shock to the system when I went city livin again.

[bogan]

Figure it out. It's not hard. If there are those who want to remove it, then those who................ else it would be removed.

Obviously someone does, but you keep insinuating they have their tendrils in the scientific community, as you are quick to blame sciency types for this possible trouble. Are you just having a wee tanty by chance? or do you actually plan on effecting some change?