Requesting a court hearing?

**superjackal** · 20th February 2014, 16:44

Hi
Going to try and waste some taxpayer dollars.
I got a ticket for 113kph which I contested on the grounds I was "flowing" with everyone else doing 113ks. Didn't wash with Sergeant G. Keay (Adjudicator), after carefully considering my correspondence he has determined that 113ks is "in excess of the allowable tolerance and too great for a warning to be given."
Here's my gripe, you get 2 months to pay before they send it to collections. I got the ticket on the 17th of December 2013 and today I got the letter dated 18th February. So, they've taken 2 months just to get back to me, not even giving me enough time to pay the notice before Baycorp get it.

Has anyone requested a court hearing before? If so, and you lose, do you have to pay any court costs or the like?

If I'm going to have to pay $80, I feel like I need to get something for it.

Cheers
SJ

**Mike.Gayner** · 20th February 2014, 16:47

Pay your fine deadbeat.

**superjackal** · 20th February 2014, 16:52

Originally Posted by Mike.Gayner

Pay your fine deadbeat.

Na-haw.....

**Akzle** · 20th February 2014, 17:07

baycorp dont get it.
The ministry of "justice" do.

Youre too ignorant to take it to court. And i mean that in the nicest possible way.

**nzspokes** · 20th February 2014, 17:08

Slow down Rossi....

**G4L4XY** · 20th February 2014, 17:11

You're just adding court costs to your fine, don't bother. Pay the fine

**Akzle** · 20th February 2014, 17:12

google your ignorant ass some "notice of conditional acceptance"
you must exhaust all discussion and negotiation with the aggrieved party before you may enter court in good standing and honour.

Start with a letter to the cops

dear sir/madam,
habeas corpus motherfuckers.
Kind regards,
superjackoff

**Brian d marge** · 20th February 2014, 17:15

113 kmph OMG

the poor man with the red flag in front of you was on form!

Could you breathe at that speed _?

Take it to court and if you can proove that all the other cars were sitting at 110 and it would have been dangerous for you to do 100

go for it

You will lose as they are a bit short of money this financial year ( the scrap value on the crushed cars didnt bring much in )

Still you will be clogging up the court , ( delay payment ! ) make the fker work foor the money

( set up a bank count and drip feed from there hahaahaa

Stephen

**Akzle** · 20th February 2014, 17:16

actually. Youve already 'contested' their jew shit. So you probably admitted liability for a civil suit somewhere along the way because youre a fucking moron.

Pay it, consider it moron tax.

Learn your shit for next time.

**BuzzardNZ** · 20th February 2014, 17:21

Originally Posted by Mike.Gayner

Pay your fine deadbeat.

+1 He broke the law fair and square. Stop moaning and cough up the $

**Akzle** · 20th February 2014, 17:29

Originally Posted by Mike.Gayner

Pay your fine deadbeat.

Originally Posted by BuzzardNZ

+1 He broke the law fair and square. Stop moaning and cough up the $

www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iwp5F1Kj4KY

**Gremlin** · 20th February 2014, 17:31

Baycorp is easy, the matter is under dispute and you don't recognise them as a party in the dispute.

As for the fine,

. Pay it or it's simply going to get bigger. Other people speeding is no excuse for you speeding, and you're pushing shit uphill. It's going to be the fine plus any court costs, which is probably more than the fine.

**Akzle** · 20th February 2014, 17:35

Originally Posted by Gremlin

Baycorp is easy, the matter is under dispute and you don't recognise them as a party in the dispute.

motherfucking third party interloper!

Didnt know you knew any shit gremz. Might have to quote some embedded media in spite.

But no. You dont want to dispute shit.
The courts exist to settle disputes.
With the jewdge ruling at the bank// err, bench, or, was that latin for... Wait. Damn jews!

**Gremlin** · 20th February 2014, 17:42

Through work I've dealt with Disputes Tribunal several times and Baycorp a few times. Things like crazy ex landlords thinking they can set Baycorp on us and we'll get scared and us chasing clients that think they don't need to pay.

Initially saying it was under dispute was enough, then they seemed to wise up and demand proof, but then you simply argue you're not handing them any information as they are not involved.